Scientists do know where to start, and we should listen to them. What we should teach are the theories that scientists are USING, and who better to tell us what those theories are than the scientists themselves.
That remains your own philisophy.
But you do realize that it is correct, no?
Unlike a religion, science should be questioned all the times as science is to confrim a truth
That doesn't make sense to me as it appears contradictory. If it should be questioned all the time then how could it be said to be confirming a truth? Wouldn't it being a truth mean it need not be questioned? I never question whether 2+2=4...
Its been explained many times that science does not seek
The TruthTM. Its an approximation... its an inference... and
it works! Look at all the wonderful things science has brought us.
while a religion is adocate a possible truth which inviting for a faith to believe.
And many religions advocate an
impossible truth and
demand their adherants have faith to believe. YEC's as an example.
You can never confirm a religion as if a religion is confirmed it's no longer a religion.
Not necessarily; it depends on what you mean by "religion".
If you click on the 'Peek' button at the bottom right my post, you can see the coding that I typed into the text box to do the various formatting. For example, if you type:
[qs]quoting is easy[/qs] or
[quote]quoting is easy[/quote]
It will come out like this:
quoting is easy
or
quote:
quoting is easy
qs stands for quote shaded and is typically used for quoting from the message your replying to, but its whatever. Just use something other than a bunch of equal signs