quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:
Life itself is testimony to a Special Creation. It exhibits CSI and IC. You can falsify that premise by showing life could originate via purely natural processes.
Same answer:
Muller, Nobel prize winning biologist, put forward IC as caused by evolution in the 1930`s (originaly proposed said IC in 1910`s) so IC really is not an issue for evolution, I have provided you with this information before, untill you show that his work was flawed and evolution cannot produce IC you cannot base an argument against evolution on IC...
The very definition of CSI permits it to occur naturaly, this possibility is absent from the EF, thus EF is inherrantly flawed by definition of CSI.
Untill you accept that it is possible in theory for laws acting on a system to produce CSI (as is permited by the definition above) and stop automaticaly gainsaying every proposed example there is no point asking for one as you will say it exhibits CSI and is thus designed.....
Which is wrong according to the very definition of CSI....
JP your arguments are eliptical with an eccentricity of 0.....
™ Version 4.2