Dawn Bertot writes:
There is, NOT ACTUALLY, your side and my side.
If that was true, we would agree. As we don't agree, then it is clearly false.
There is not actually, YOUR investigation and MINE. there is just an investgation
Neither you nor I are carrying out an investigation. We're both spectating what science is doing. I am reporting the scientific outcomes as I understand them, you are making stuff up in your head and claiming that it is science. It is not science it's stuff you're making up that does not in any way conform to the scientific consensus.
If you actually were carrying out an investigation you would have some actual facts. You do not have any facts to support the stuff you make up.
Becuase that which Ihave just stated is actually the CASE and true, it follows that that investigation has to have an end hypo.
Because the stuff you make up in your head and you alone believe is not true or even real, you'll not be surprised to hear that I disagree.
But even if it was true, your conclusion that science's end hypothesis (whatever that means - the phrase has no meaning to anyone but yourself) it would still be wrong. It's wrong because a scientific theory STARTS with a bloody hypothesis - it doesn't end with one.
"This is because the ToE deals with how life developed AFTER life began and because we have proof beyond reasonable doubt that life evolved and was not created as we see it today"
My friend, this is what you need to prove, not just assert. You cant just asser this proposition, then assume it is true
The ToE IS the proof. If you wish to have a discussion about science you need to start from there - inconvenient though that may be for you.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
™ Version 4.2
(1)
