Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,772 Year: 4,029/9,624 Month: 900/974 Week: 227/286 Day: 34/109 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christianity Today: Atheism is the only rational outlook.
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 91 of 95 (403010)
05-31-2007 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Dr Adequate
05-31-2007 11:11 AM


Re: Columbus, Lewis And Clark
You are lying. Your reply was "That's right, every explorer knew where they were going before they left" --- something which I never said, and do not believe, and which I specifically pointed out was not true.
Generally, does an explorer know where he is going but not what he will find?
For example, Columbus definitely knew were he was going. He never reached the destination, but that has nothing to do with whether or not he knew where he was headed.
Louis & Clark knew where they were going, and in fact they had a specific charge stating where they were to go and what they were to do.
Journeys of Exploration almost always have a known charge, be it to find the headwaters of the Nile or the Moon, there is still a goal.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-31-2007 11:11 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 92 of 95 (403201)
06-01-2007 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by Dr Adequate
05-31-2007 11:11 AM


Re: Columbus, Lewis And Clark
Let me know if you come up with one single shred of empirical evidence for him, as Columbus did for the existence of America.
So far there is no empirical evidence for Him.
IT will be subjective, even if He shows up in your bedroom tonight.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-31-2007 11:11 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Rrhain, posted 11-09-2011 12:48 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18335
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 93 of 95 (640122)
11-07-2011 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by jar
05-29-2007 10:34 AM


People Don't Want To Know The Truth
jar writes:
The two questions remain:
How do you know it is God?
How do you know it is the Holy Spirit?
I never know for certain, though if the instructions are based on my ideas of morality, ethics, and altruism...I can guess.
Of course, I also ask myself...how do I know it isn't God.
I could then blame a devil. OR...I could accept responsibility for the inner unction.
If my inner unction tells me to give somebody money, I take full responsibility for losing (or giving away) that money.
You say that people need to accept responsibility for their decisions, actions, and choices. I agree...to a point. I will not accept responsibility for my fathers actions, nor those of his generation. I also will not continue to accept responsibility for past actions of my country. I will accept responsibility for what I and my generation are doing, even though it may mean that I lose everything.
Atheism is certainly one possible outlook and philosophy, though it is no more rational than my talking with my conscience.
Edited by Phat, : added clarification

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by jar, posted 05-29-2007 10:34 AM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Jon, posted 11-08-2011 7:30 PM Phat has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 94 of 95 (640338)
11-08-2011 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Phat
11-07-2011 12:00 PM


Re: People Don't Want To Know The Truth
I never know for certain, though if the instructions are based on my ideas of morality, ethics, and altruism...I can guess.
So you look at the message itself? If it's the message itself that you are judging, why does it even matter who it comes from?
Of course, I also ask myself...how do I know it isn't God.
Confirmation bias.
Atheism is certainly one possible outlook and philosophy, though it is no more rational than my talking with my conscience.
Of course it isn't; as far as atheists are concerned, if you are talking to someone that isn't there, you could only be talking to your conscience.
Jon

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Phat, posted 11-07-2011 12:00 PM Phat has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 95 of 95 (640370)
11-09-2011 12:48 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by riVeRraT
06-01-2007 10:31 AM


riVeRraT writes:
quote:
So far there is no empirical evidence for Him.
IT will be subjective, even if He shows up in your bedroom tonight.
Not if he's recorded. Not if he decides to stick around.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by riVeRraT, posted 06-01-2007 10:31 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024