Why not Phillip E. Johnson?
To be blunt, most of us are well aware that ID is complete and utter crap. There really isn't much behind it other than weak arguments intended to sneak creationism into K-12 public schools. And is anyone closer to the center of that mess than Johnson?
You're not in any danger of being indoctrinated, and the English major turned lawyer is unlikely to present any reasoning that is over the typical science follower's head. So my guess is that a perusal of Johnson's work ought to yield a pretty insightful look into the sham that is ID.
It can't be any worse than listening to the your favorite proponent on EvC, who typically knows next to nothing about the subject.
Seems like he is a liar, crybaby and an AIDS denier. What a winner.
Sounds like excellent credentials to me.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
