Brad i read this much:
Dynamics IS NOT kinematics. That is a fact is it not?
I said that the species of bacteria and other small kinds may indeed be "blurred" in the sense that the LOGIC in the original question that was brought up in this thread but that those that realy have sustained the brunt of knowledge in biological change the marsupials, birds, some frogs, a worm, the tunicate etc BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE SAME process but a different pattern (hence seperatness) than the chromonemals. I did not say what defined the kinemtics differently that permits this interpreation which is what is needed epistemelogically and hence "if true" but this does not change the ontology in fact in the factual analysis of the logic in the question that I did answer in a way.
I don't understand a bit of it. This is why I don't read your posts. It is just too hard for me. I'm not smart enough or don't have enough vocabularly is possible. It is also possible that you are going to have to write in simpler sentences.