|
Author
|
Topic: Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate
|
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 367 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: 08-04-2010
|
|
Message 196 of 653 (633835)
09-16-2011 5:46 PM
|
|
|
Red on blue
Thanks for the replies everyone. Which way to the universe where everything works better with age?
|
Aware Wolf
Member (Idle past 1438 days) Posts: 156 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 02-13-2009
|
|
|
Message 197 of 653 (635322)
09-28-2011 4:27 PM
|
|
|
Acknowledge?
How does one acknowledge a post, as opposed to responding?
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 198 by hooah212002, posted 09-28-2011 4:34 PM | | Aware Wolf has seen this message but not replied |
|
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 820 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: 08-12-2009
|
Re: Acknowledge?
At the bottom of the offending post, click where it says "Aware Wolf has not yet responded".
"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 197 by Aware Wolf, posted 09-28-2011 4:27 PM | | Aware Wolf has seen this message but not replied |
|
Omnivorous
Member Posts: 3983 From: Adirondackia Joined: 07-21-2005 Member Rating: 7.0
|
Re: Red on blue
Dogmafood writes: Which way to the universe where everything works better with age? Upstream.
"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 196 by Dogmafood, posted 09-16-2011 5:46 PM | | Dogmafood has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 200 by Dogmafood, posted 09-28-2011 9:01 PM | | Omnivorous has not replied |
|
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 367 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: 08-04-2010
|
Re: Red on blue
Upstream.  I suspected as much. Oh well then...I'll just carry on this way.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 199 by Omnivorous, posted 09-28-2011 8:14 PM | | Omnivorous has not replied |
|
Chuck77
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 201 of 653 (635834)
10-02-2011 4:42 AM
|
|
|
Chat
Quick question; was there ever a chat option here? Click box, chat with other members? A chat app? Quick suggestion; can we get one? Quick analysis; if there was does it detract from the debate from any? For instance, people will stop commenting and instead just chat? I think it would be nice if you could chat here with other members are real time speed every so often. Go into chat, ask some questions, people will be able to see you are not being condescending, arrogant, etc etc. Just some thoughts on chat.
|
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4163 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: 02-24-2011
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 202 of 653 (635835)
10-02-2011 4:58 AM
|
Reply to: Message 201 by Chuck77
10-02-2011 4:42 AM
|
|
Re: Chat
I think it is on the to do list.
"No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...and if it occasionally gets a little heavier than what you had in mind, well...maybe chalk it off to forced conscious expansion: Tune in, freak out, get beaten."
Hunter S. Thompson Ad astra per aspera Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 201 by Chuck77, posted 10-02-2011 4:42 AM | | Chuck77 has not replied |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 13013 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 1.9
|
|
|
Message 203 of 653 (635843)
10-02-2011 7:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 201 by Chuck77
10-02-2011 4:42 AM
|
|
Re: Chat
F&L is correct, it's on the todo list, but you are correct, too, we did used to have chat. It was provided by third party software. Initially it was free, then $10/year, then $25/year, then $75/year. At the last price hike I disabled the feature, and I don't know what the price is now. But because I want to take this discussion board software commercial I couldn't continue to use 3rd party software anyway. We have to have our own native chat facility, and it is on the todo list, but the programming department is a bit shorthanded and there is no schedule at present.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 201 by Chuck77, posted 10-02-2011 4:42 AM | | Chuck77 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 205 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 12:51 PM | | Admin has seen this message but not replied | | | Message 208 by Larni, posted 10-02-2011 6:08 PM | | Admin has seen this message but not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
|
Message 204 of 653 (635854)
10-02-2011 8:56 AM
|
Reply to: Message 201 by Chuck77
10-02-2011 4:42 AM
|
|
Re: Chat
You could always start an IRC channel if you wanted and then folk could chat.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 201 by Chuck77, posted 10-02-2011 4:42 AM | | Chuck77 has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 205 of 653 (635867)
10-02-2011 12:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 203 by Admin
10-02-2011 7:08 AM
|
|
Re: Chat forum?
Hi Percy,
F&L is correct, it's on the todo list, but you are correct, too, we did used to have chat. It was provided by third party software. Initially it was free, then $10/year, then $25/year, then $75/year. At the last price hike I disabled the feature, and I don't know what the price is now. What is the difference between a chat function and open discussion on an open forum thread? Why not just have a "CHAT" forum and people can start chats on any topic, discuss them, and do anything you can do in a chat room, couldn't they? Put it in Side Orders with minimal moderation. Similar to Free For AllInterested in free and wild debate unencumbered by most moderation? Then this is the forum for you. Just stay on topic. CHAT Interested in free ranging and unencumbered chats with other members with minimal moderation? Want to branch off from existing threads and not be tied to a topic? Then this is the forum for you. Just keep it legal and "family friendly". Just a thought. Certainly could be an interim solution? Enjoy. Edited by Zen Deist, : added
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 203 by Admin, posted 10-02-2011 7:08 AM | | Admin has seen this message but not replied |
|
Wounded King
Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: 04-09-2003
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 206 of 653 (635869)
10-02-2011 1:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 205 by RAZD
10-02-2011 12:51 PM
|
|
Re: Chat forum?
The difference is in timing, a live chat session is quite different from an ongoing discussion on a message board. To get the same sort of experience on a normal EVC thread all the participants would need to be clicking on refresh about once a second. TTFN, WK
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 205 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 12:51 PM | | RAZD has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 210 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 11:08 PM | | Wounded King has seen this message but not replied |
|
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 820 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: 08-12-2009
|
|
|
Message 207 of 653 (635882)
10-02-2011 4:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 205 by RAZD
10-02-2011 12:51 PM
|
|
Re: Chat forum?
Put it in Side Orders with minimal moderation. There should be ZERO moderation in chat. Second, a chat would be private (save for Percy being able to view the logs) without the community being able to intrude on the conversation.
"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 205 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 12:51 PM | | RAZD has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 211 by RAZD, posted 10-02-2011 11:09 PM | | hooah212002 has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 208 of 653 (635885)
10-02-2011 6:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 203 by Admin
10-02-2011 7:08 AM
|
|
Re: Chat
It's a shame it will take time to do a chat function; I really enjoyed it when we had the feature, here.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 203 by Admin, posted 10-02-2011 7:08 AM | | Admin has seen this message but not replied |
|
Wounded King
Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: 04-09-2003
|
|
|
Message 209 of 653 (635903)
10-02-2011 7:34 PM
|
Reply to: Message 208 by Larni
10-02-2011 6:08 PM
|
|
Re: Chat
Well like Jar says, it wouldn't be hard to arrange an IRC channel somewhere that people could use until there is a formal chat system. TTFN, WK
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 208 by Larni, posted 10-02-2011 6:08 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
Re: Chat forum?
Limit the posts to 200 characters and it should not take that long to make a post and then see the rest of the posts when it refreshes. Personally I don't need faster.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 206 by Wounded King, posted 10-02-2011 1:53 PM | | Wounded King has seen this message but not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2