Why Creationists' Willful Ignorance?

quote:

---

Why are you asking me what kind it is?
Do you not know?
But since 'winged creatures' is not a 'kind' listed in the bible - I would expect that you are wrong.
Where do mosquitoes fit into your 'kinds'?
Are they land kind; are they water kind or are the airborne kind?

​

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

I wasn't asking - I was reminding you to read before wasting virtual ink. 'Winged creatures' are surely listed, even as emerging from the waters, in the only hard copy texts greater than 2,300 years old.

quote:

---

Re: Call 911
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

​

What the hell does "the first recording of life form groupings" even mean?

---

Here we go again! I said it in my native language too, clearly and with no other meaning applying. Life form groupings are 'species' of life forms with common denominators [e.g. land based]; first recording is - 'FIRST RECORDING OF IT'.

Homeosaps with a NAME, date, place - followed by evidencial history of a diarised calendar are thus the non-virtual kind.What's the oldest human NAME on record?

quote:

---

Frst off, I don't own a frog.

​

Second, we've been talking about it. You asked where life forms had been recorded prior to the Bible.

​

I pointed out cave paintings. In response, you claimed that there should be 5 trillion aboriginies. ?!?!

​

Then YOU brought up the fact that Egyptian heiroglyphics also demonstrate different kinds of animals and predate the bible.

​

Fantastic. So, between the two of us, that's 2 things which predate your claim.

​

So, that's that.

---

60K cave drawings are not life form groupings - these are just alledged 60K year old drawings; the term specie is a direct lift off from Genesis of a first recording of it with a new name.Yes, 60K and 30K humans able to perform animal drawings would number in the billions and trillions today. Not to mention mental prowess increments.Why did you not ask such questions insead of opening mouth wide and saying AAH YES PLS?

Once more with feelings:Alledged 60K humans who performed animal drawings, with no graduated imprints on the ground thereafter - are 'VIRTUAL'The listing of humans with names, writings, their ages, dod & dobs, locations, unearthed relics, etc - are the non-virtual kind.

This, like many such posts, say the non-creationists have lost all credibility, and has become akin to another radical fundamentalist religion.

Q: What's the first recording of life form groupings?

Q: What's the first recording of life form groupings?

Q: What's the first recording of life form groupings?

Q: What's the first recording of life form groupings?

Q: What's the first recording of life form groupings?

ADAM. 5770 years old; the proof of it is irrelevent to being the oldest via the given time factor. Was that a question?

There is no record of history per se outside that date and writings. However, its truth does not impact. It remains the oldest 'RECORDED' declaration.

Stop acting silly.

Pls do. How long can one poster be allowed to shame so many for so long!