Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Syamsu a creationist or an evolutionist?
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3247 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 107 of 192 (62570)
10-24-2003 12:49 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Syamsu
09-25-2003 2:49 AM


Ladies and Gentlemen, I give
you proof of an unevolving and unchanging universe....Syamsu. Just as wrong and ignorant as ever and yet his is STILL not extinct.
First off logic, or the lack thereof.
quote:
It's not very convincing to say that the point of comparison is to compare things. The camouflaged reproduce 4 times more then the colorful, which means the colorful reproduce 4 times less then the camouflaged. Now what? 4 and 1/4, still meaningless as far as I can tell.
First off, while aI agree that it could have been better stated, the point was still plain. The point of comparison is to determine similarities and differences between two or more differing sets. If you don't compare these sets, i.e. perform an ACT of comparison, then you can not reach your endpoint of determining similarities and differences. You end up like Syamsu, spinning your wheels in the eternal ignorant void.
quote:
In antibiotic resistance I'm guessing that the "resistant" bacteria becomes reproductively stable at a certain populationsize in the body, and that the doctor should realise that taking out the competitors of the resistant bacteria would contribute to the reproduction of the "resistant" bacteria.
Please demonstrate where Natural Selection becomes meaningful in antibiotic resistance.
First off, when competent MDs find resistent bacteria they generally switch to a different antibiotic to kill the strain off. With that settled, Syamsu are you KIDDING me. The shift in a frequency of an allele based survivability w.r.t. outside fources is one of the key components of Neo-Darwinian NS. How many times does this need to be explained to you?
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
and my family motto
Transfixus sed non mortis
Taz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Syamsu, posted 09-25-2003 2:49 AM Syamsu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Syamsu, posted 10-25-2003 9:16 AM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3247 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 139 of 192 (63323)
10-29-2003 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Syamsu
10-29-2003 1:24 AM


Re: a second opinion
Hi Syamsu, while I have said that your comments are essentially worthless, that you do not respond to the points made to you, that you are profoundly ignorant of either biology or any other area of science as far as I can tell, or that your approach to logic appears to be equally without foundation, I do not ever remember saying that I would not reply to you or your erroneous assertions. I do recall on occasion saying that I don't have time to respond but that means something a little different. Care to back at least one of your comments up and post a link to my supposed statement?
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
and my family motto
Transfixus sed non mortis
Taz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Syamsu, posted 10-29-2003 1:24 AM Syamsu has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024