|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Two Floods and a confusing type of god. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1787 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Why does everyone put GOd in a little box, and try to give him human characterisitcs, and try to sum him up with human logic. Because according to your mythology we've got the same ability to tell the difference between good and bad that God does. He even says so:
quote: If we've got God's own ability to tell the difference between good and evil, that means that we can use that ability to determine if the actions of God are good or evil (or stupid), just as he judges our own actions. God may judge us but even God admits that we get to judge him, too. Of course, this is all just silly mythology - it doesn't matter what it says because none of it is true. ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5353 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
The difference is you can not change whatever GOD does for good or evil but you as a human have this choice. I had this thought as a teenager and CHOOSE THE GOOD because even If I wanted to be evil and try to change against GOD he"" could just change it before my changes went into effect so if I have any influence it makes more sense just to do what IS good to God and not to even clutter my mind with a good OR Bad doing evil that that gOD did not exist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prozacman Inactive Member |
Sorry Shraff. This reply should be to Newborn. There is a statement near the beginning of Genesis in which GOD created mankind in HIS IMAGE. If we suppose that "his image" really means, LIKE HIM, then we have reason to think God is also very much LIKE US. If that is the case, then it's no wonder God does some nasty things thru the rest of the Bible. He's just like us. We do nasty things sometimes and if you read your Bible without a religious bias that says 'God is Good', then you'll see that he does nasty things also. I write this to make a point, and that is this: you are reading and interpreting the Bible hoping that what it says all fits together nicely to confirm your christian beliefs about God. As I've shown above, one can read & see a very different sort of God in the Bible.[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-20-2003]
[This message has been edited by Prozacman, 10-20-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
I am going to try to answer this but first an important note. Ive just started to read through some of the issues on these forums and one of the Problems i see is one of translation. MOst people here are using some kind of english translation which sooner or later, has error or at least some terrible misaccuracy. I read, write, and speak fluent hebrew and can read a decent aramaic so can view the material in the orginal. And here we have a simple problem of mistranslation. The verse in the original does NOt say G_d regretted - the verb used is: says: "Vayinachem" - which actually means G-d changed [his relationship] how he connects to Man -[here from mercy to judgment - same verb used in numbers 23, dueteronomy 32, exodus 32, samuel I ch 15 -all use the verb 'nicham' which means -change of thought/direction on relations with].... SO now judgment comes in the form of a flood. Hebrew helps a lot. Besides which, in the talmud there is a general rule about anthrpomophic Torah statements- the Torah spoke in the language of man - ie G-d is portrayed with human characterisitcs so that limited physical man can have an understanding G-d's "reaction". Since finite man can not ever truly grasp infinite G-d, these terms are necessary for imparting the message..but G-d does not regret or smile or cry or laugh oe smell sacrficies - so what does it mean that G-d smells etc? that G-d accepted the offering and its as if he 'smelled' the good aroma, the way a man would enjoy a good scent..ie it was "pleasureable" to G-d,meaning he agreed with Noah's action. If anyone is interested, a lot of these questions can be easily answered in the Medieval Jewish commentaries -Rashi, Eben Ezra, Ramban [Gersonides], Abrabanel, Sforno, Tosfot, Ralbag, and later ones like Malbim, Hirsch, Kli Yakar, Ohr Hachaim,...there are anthologies too like The Torah Anthology -tranlsated to english by Aryeh Kaplan.. please check them out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5353 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
Thanks, that was a nice post.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rei Member (Idle past 7333 days) Posts: 1546 From: Iowa City, IA Joined: |
Hey Mendy - I've never seen you here before. It's good to have someone here who can read hebrew without having to consult a dictionary, and who is well versed in rabbinical analyses of the torah. Enjoy your stay at EVC.
![]() ------------------"Illuminant light, illuminate me."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ConsequentAtheist Member (Idle past 6559 days) Posts: 392 Joined: |
The verse in the original does NOt say G_d regretted - the verb used is: says: "Vayinachem" - which actually means G-d changed [his relationship] how he connects to Man -[here from mercy to judgment - same verb used in numbers 23, dueteronomy 32, exodus 32, samuel I ch 15 -all use the verb 'nicham' which means -change of thought/direction on relations with]....
With all due respect for your linguistic abilities, can you suggest
quote:As for the second question, I notice that:
I read, write, and speak fluent hebrew and can read a decent aramaic so can view the material in the orginal.
Parenthetically, what you read is not the original, but, instead, a redaction and harmonization of source material probably no older that the Second Temple Period. You might find Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, by Emanuel Tov, very much worth reading in this area. [This message has been edited by ConsequentAtheist, 11-02-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 5280 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
HI and welcome to the forum.
I have a coule of questions regarding your post.
I read, write, and speak fluent hebrew Who do you speak this fluent Hebrew too?
and can read a decent aramaic so can view the material in the orginal. Could you clarify what you mean by 'original' here? Many Thanks. Brian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
Thanx. i cant say that im well versed in rabbinical analyses of torah but i have some background. i am enjoying my stay here -but i just cant find the time to answer as often as i like. Maybe on weekends but i hope no one is surprised if i have long pauses in my answers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
i should be more careful. i speak hebrew to toher hebrew speakers, Israelis mainly- but that is modern hebrew.
original means any of the current Mikraot Gedolot hebrew editions, or Artscroll, Stone, KEter etc. - basically, the masoretic text
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
well, i didnt say the view i brought down was theonly view- it is anotrher view which i think has merit. it comes from the second explanation of Rashi on that verse and he brings the folling examples where nchm is used as explained -changed:
here they are: numbers 23, dueteronomy 32, exodus 32, samuel I ch 15
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
regarding ONkelos and YOnatan:
your source for onkelos reads: And it repented the Lord in His Word that He had made men upon the earth What is "and it repented" mean ? that he 'was sorry' ? can G-d be sorry? Here is Onkelos in aramaic - i give my own understading "Vetav Ado-nai bememrei arei avad yat adam" -literal translation [as best i can] = and G-d returned in his word that he made the man - sowhat does that mean? so you are right that it does not mean the same as the Rashi i brought befiore -but i am giving an altrernat eexplanation which is valid. BTW, i think the best answer to this and all similar anthropomorphic statments is that the Torah spoken in mans language....its not meanrt literally that G-d regreted.was sorry/returned but that man didnt live up to expectations.....ok got to go
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mendy Inactive Member |
last post- thanx for the book -i will try to read it...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ConsequentAtheist Member (Idle past 6559 days) Posts: 392 Joined: |
original means ... basically, the masoretic text
The Masoretic Texts are a product of the early Middle Ages.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 5280 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
Hi,
i should be more careful. i speak hebrew to toher hebrew speakers, Israelis mainly- but that is modern hebrew. Thanks for clearing this up, I am glad you did because, believe it or not, there are people out there who think that Biblical Hebrew is a widely spoken language. I know there was a sort of mini revival but this was not exactly classical Hebrew. But we do have ot be careful on these forums because people do jump to wrongful conclusions, but thanks for clarification. Brian
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025