Straggler writes:
What used to qualify Thor as supernatural that he is now lacking?
Why can something not be both a known fiction and supernatural?
It's the difference between a supernatual concept and a supernatural being that actually exists.
As a card-carrying bluegenes' theoretician, wouldn't you agree that so far all known supernatural concepts are fiction?
As for Thor, back in the day there were enough folks at the top of the information chain who held the view that Thor, the supernatural being, was real and thus for a while it was a prevailing concept writ large. Of course, Thor was not considered to be anything in other areas of the world, since back then, from those other parts of the world, reciprocally, "other areas of the world" were most likely not even thought of.
Remember the white english speaking journalist confronting Shaka Zulu Khan and telling him about this dude Jesus in that nice documentary. Strange things have happened.
- xongsmith, 5.7d