Money Isn't a False God

I think that's why some people equate gods with money. Both can magically get us what we want. False gods can get us what we think we want but "the real God" can get us what we really, really want.

---

If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate

So you're infallible.

How can you know that unless you're infallible? I'm using the argument that since you refuse to consider the possibility that you might be wrong, you must think you're infallible.It has nothing to do with whether or not your God is infallible. YOU would have to be infallible to interpret His "communion" with no chance of error.

No, that's not what I'm trying to argue. I haven't said a word about probability.I'm pointing out that if you absolutely refuse to consider the possibility that you are wrong, then you are claiming to be infallible - because that is the definition of infallible, the inability to be wrong."Communion" doesn't enter into it. Jesus' ability to speak to you infallibly is not related to your ability to understand infallibly. I couldn't care less what you buy. I'm just pointing out the sheer stupidity of your theology in the hope that some lurker won't be fooled by you.

Nope. I have never "assumed" that no actual God exists. I'm just pointing out that the God that YOU have made up makes no sense. It is inconsistent with your own source, the Bible. And if it did exist, it would be unworthy of communion with humans. Well, of course they can. YOU define the validity of other people's beliefs based on nothing but your prejudice. Why can't people define the validity of YOUR belief based on reality? But you're using it wrong.

Well, that's what the word means. You're the one who falls for the nonsense that the apologists spew. You should probably leave that statement stuck on your bumper where it belongs. So you DO claim to be infallible. Why did you deny it for so long? It's the same thing.