Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9208 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,417 Year: 6,674/9,624 Month: 14/238 Week: 14/22 Day: 5/9 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Education and Creation/Evolution ⇒

Creationism in science classrooms (an argument for)

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
Author Topic:   Creationism in science classrooms (an argument for)
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4438 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 517 of 609 (612028)
04-12-2011 6:42 PM 		Reply to: Message 515 by Dawn Bertot
04-12-2011 6:33 PM

Re: Off topic rudeness.
its only what can be demonstrated from a scientific approach, which ID and creationism accomplish , having nothing to with religion or the spiritual
​
You made the above statement, now back it up with evidence.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 515 by Dawn Bertot, posted 04-12-2011 6:33 PM Dawn Bertot has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 520 by Dawn Bertot, posted 04-12-2011 7:24 PM bluescat48 has replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4438 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 527 of 609 (612051)
04-12-2011 8:20 PM 		Reply to: Message 520 by Dawn Bertot
04-12-2011 7:24 PM

Re: Off topic rudeness.
Quit beating around the bush and provide the evidence.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by Dawn Bertot, posted 04-12-2011 7:24 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4438 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 597 of 609 (612475)
04-16-2011 1:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 584 by Robert Byers
04-15-2011 2:27 AM

Re: Creationism is Religion
It bans creationism because it does matter.
​
No it doesn't. It bans creationism is science classes the same way as alchemy, astrology and magic are banned, because it is not SCIENCE.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 584 by Robert Byers, posted 04-15-2011 2:27 AM Robert Byers has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024