Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,410 Year: 3,667/9,624 Month: 538/974 Week: 151/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "Thuglicans" and the Tea "Federation Party"
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 121 of 127 (609550)
03-21-2011 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
03-21-2011 11:22 AM


Re: The Violent and the Non-Violent
Buzsaw writes:
Yes, I am the unbeliever, but guess what. The Islamic fundamentalists are teaching and practicing exactly as I read it and as I observe them teaching and practicing. I'm being very objective, reading their scriptures and observing them practicing what I've read. Methinks you need to get objective, me brother.
I'm not making any claim of being objective. We all come to this with our subjective views, and that includes you. I'm not sure how much time you spend observing Muslims but I again make the point that the vast majority of the world's Muslims wish to live at peace with their neighbours.
Buzsaw writes:
For what it's worth, if those fundamentals were observed in modern churches, God would be pleased. It was his Holy Spirit who inspired them to be written. Having said that, I'm not on a soap box advocating those fundamentals, regarding women, but I do refuse to sit under a woman preacher or teacher of men in any church, that being the role of men, Biblically. That is why there have never been any great or renowned women preacher or evangelists. Women are free to teach children and other women, however. If you want to discuss that further, I will participate if you propose a thread on it.
As I said somewhere else I don't accept the Bible as the fourth member of the Trinity. The Bible is a gift from God, and if we read it with Godly wisdom we can discern the path the God wants us to walk on. If it is taken as the great rule book then I believe that what God really wants to say to us is being missed.
The message in my view is that God wants us to reach out to those of other faiths in love and charity. Read this verse from Matthew 7.
quote:
21 Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
IMHO the Muslim who acts with love and charity to his neighbour is closer to God than the Christian who condemns that same Muslim for his faith.
Edited by GDR, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 03-21-2011 11:22 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Buzsaw, posted 03-21-2011 1:35 PM GDR has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 127 (609551)
03-21-2011 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by DrJones*
03-21-2011 11:38 AM


Re: The Violent and the Non-Violent
DrJones* writes:
I'm being very objective..
Given your racist tendencies I find this very hard to believe
...reading their scriptures
Really Buz? when did you learn Arabic?
I don't do Arabic, but what I'm observing and reading is what the Muslim fundamentalists teach and practice, both historically and currently. They attest to the fact that the translations which I have read are accurate relative to the violent verses/doctrines of their scriptures.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by DrJones*, posted 03-21-2011 11:38 AM DrJones* has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 127 (609568)
03-21-2011 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by GDR
03-21-2011 11:55 AM


Re: The Violent and the Non-Violent
GDR writes:
Buzsaw writes:
Yes, I am the unbeliever, but guess what. The Islamic fundamentalists are teaching and practicing exactly as I read it and as I observe them teaching and practicing. I'm being very objective, reading their scriptures and observing them practicing what I've read. Methinks you need to get objective, me brother.
I'm not making any claim of being objective. We all come to this with our subjective views, and that includes you. I'm not sure how much time you spend observing Muslims but I again make the point that the vast majority of the world's Muslims wish to live at peace with their neighbours.
Yah, sure, GDR, like Israel's Islamic neighbors working to drive the nation into the Mediterranean Sea and like the Iraqi and Iran wars when the Iran Shiites and the Iraqi Sunnis slaughtered one another by the tens of thousands.
Like now the Islam Brotherhood and their Shiite Hezbolah allies are slaughtering the Egyptian and Lybian Sunni Hammas, with the US & NATO siding with the Hezbolah-ish Shiites in each and every war?
Yah sure, neighboring one another into their graves. Better do you homework, my brother. Our government and the US sheeple are certainly not.
For what it's worth, our president's family were/are Sunni. He doesn't really want to take out Gadaffi, the good bud of Louis Farrakhan and Jeremiah Wright, Obama's former pastor. Thus his reluctance to bring on the air cover on behalf of the Hezbolah types. He's being pressured into this action. Thus also, his underming of the Afgan war and the imputus to end our war effort in Iraq on behalf of the Shiites there.
GDR writes:
Buzsaw writes:
For what it's worth, if those fundamentals were observed in modern churches, God would be pleased. It was his Holy Spirit who inspired them to be written. Having said that, I'm not on a soap box advocating those fundamentals, regarding women, but I do refuse to sit under a woman preacher or teacher of men in any church, that being the role of men, Biblically. That is why there have never been any great or renowned women preacher or evangelists. Women are free to teach children and other women, however. If you want to discuss that further, I will participate if you propose a thread on it.
As I said somewhere else I don't accept the Bible as the fourth member of the Trinity. The Bible is a gift from God, and if we read it with Godly wisdom we can discern the path the God wants us to walk on. If it is taken as the great rule book then I believe that what God really wants to say to us is being missed.
So you reject that the Holy Scriptures were inspired by God via his Holy Spirit and that it is necessarily true? Are you aware of the last chapter of it and elsewhere that warn against adding to or detracting from it?
GDR writes:
The message in my view is that God wants us to reach out to those of other faiths in love and charity. Read this verse from Matthew 7.
We are to reach out and care for their necessities, to evangelize them and to love them, but not to love or accept their doctrines or ways. Christian fundamentalist organizations such as the Voice of The Martyrs, Samaritan's Purse and World Vision work and risk their own lives to help all, particularly the oppressed. I contribute liberally to VOM, knowing full well that some of my funds go to help Muslims. I have no problem with that.
GDR writes:
quote:
21 Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
You are aware, I hope, that spiritual brethren of Jesus are all Christian.
GDR writes:
IMHO the Muslim who acts with love and charity to his neighbour is closer to God than the Christian who condemns that same Muslim for what his faith.
Jesus said "no man comes to the father (God) but by me." He also condemned, verbally, the Sadducee's, the Pharisees and all who oppose his gospel. What do you do with that?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by GDR, posted 03-21-2011 11:55 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by GDR, posted 03-21-2011 2:27 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 125 by fearandloathing, posted 03-21-2011 2:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


(2)
Message 124 of 127 (609584)
03-21-2011 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by Buzsaw
03-21-2011 1:35 PM


Re: The Violent and the Non-Violent
Buzsaw writes:
Yah sure, neighboring one another into their graves. Better do you homework, my brother. Our government and the US sheeple are certainly not.
I'm not denying that there have been atrocities committed in the name of the various Islamic factions, but in the end it always it comes back to greed and power. At the very heart of the Christian faith is the fact that God loves us and wants us to be reflectors of that love. The worst thing that we can do is tar them all with the same negative brush, thereby isolating them or worse.
Buzsaw writes:
For what it's worth, our president's family were/are Sunni. He doesn't really want to take out Gadaffi, the good bud of Louis Farrakhan and Jeremiah Wright, Obama's former pastor. Thus his reluctance to bring on the air cover on behalf of the Hezbolah types. He's being pressured into this action. Thus also, his underming of the Afgan war and the imputus to end our war effort in Iraq on behalf of the Shiites there.
Frankly Buz I'm not going to dignify that with any response.
Buzsaw writes:
So you reject that the Holy Scriptures were inspired by God via his Holy Spirit and that it is necessarily true?
No I do not. I'm rejecting your interpretation of the message that God is giving us through the scriptures.
Buzsaw writes:
Are you aware of the last chapter of it and elsewhere that warn against adding to or detracting from it?
I'm fully aware of it and I'm also fully aware that the NT didn't exist at all at that time, and that even the OT hadn't been put together in the form we have it today. It also has nothing to do with this discussion because are disagreement is about how God wants us to understand the Bible.
Buzsaw writes:
We are to reach out and care for their necessities, to evangelize them and to love them, but not to love or accept their doctrines or ways. Christian fundamentalist organizations such as the Voice of The Martyrs, Samaritan's Purse and World Vision work and risk their own lives to help all, particularly the oppressed. I contribute liberally to VOM, knowing full well that some of my funds go to help Muslims. I have no problem with that.
Do you really think that it is only so-called fundamentalist, (as you define them), Christians that donate to these funds? For that matter, do you really think that it is only fundamentalist Christians that run them? I'm not going to start a competition with you about who gives more to Christian charities, but for you to claim the work done by the organizations that you mentioned is completely the work of those that hold to your views is ridiculous.
GDR writes:
IMHO the Muslim who acts with love and charity to his neighbour is closer to God than the Christian who condemns that same Muslim for what his faith.
Buzsaw writes:
Jesus said "no man comes to the father (God) but by me." He also condemned, verbally, the Sadducee's, the Pharisees and all who oppose his gospel. What do you do with that?
The gospel message is that there is good news. We have a God who loves us, and as humans, of all stripes, created in his image we are called to live out a life that humbly loves kindness, and practices justice. (Micha 6:8) If a Muslim does that and his Christian neighbour doesn't, then yes I agree that the Muslim is closer to God than his Christian neighbour.
What God wants is loving hearts. It isn't about giving intellectual assent to any particular doctrine.
Edited by GDR, : Got my Bible verse wrong. Gotta work on that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Buzsaw, posted 03-21-2011 1:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 125 of 127 (609587)
03-21-2011 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by Buzsaw
03-21-2011 1:35 PM


Re: The Violent and the Non-Violent
Buzz you would've made a fine crusader, take that how you want.
I will tell you I feel your flavor of Christianity scares me, JMHO. It seems to me you should be praying for them to find JC, Maybe you should try some missionary work, expose yourself to different cultures and belifs. I would say teach them about JC, but no you should probably listen to someone else who preaches the teachings of JC, for many of your view's are poison.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Buzsaw, posted 03-21-2011 1:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 126 of 127 (609883)
03-24-2011 3:34 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
03-21-2011 11:22 AM


Promoting the coming of Armageddon?
Buz, at the Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0 you posted:
Buzsaw writes:
Message 119
This is the third time Jar has repeated the same ole one liners, which I have addressed in previous messages.
This refers to Jar's message 119, which in its entirety is:
Jar writes:
Did you say "Providentially, what our nation has done, militarily and otherwise is often beneficial to the preservation of Israel, the messianic coming kingdom of God."?
Do you believe in Armageddon?
Jar asked about or mentions Armageddon in 88, 90, 119. Buz does not explicitly answer the "Do you believe in Armageddon?" question, but he does strongly imply (the Bible says it's going to happen) that such is his belief. Buz, however, does seem to repeatedly (more or less) dodge the other portion of message 119.
Re: The "dodged question":
As I see it, Buz's position is that fundamentalist Christianity's Armageddon position is that of being observers but not in any way as being promoters. As I see it, Jar's position is that at least some of the fundamentalist Christianity movement acts to actually promote the coming of Armageddon.
So, that is the question to Buz:
Do at least some of the fundamentalist Christianity movement act to actually promote the coming of Armageddon?
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 03-21-2011 11:22 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Coragyps, posted 03-24-2011 3:51 PM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 127 of 127 (609926)
03-24-2011 3:51 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Adminnemooseus
03-24-2011 3:34 AM


Re: Promoting the coming of Armageddon?
Do at least some of the fundamentalist Christianity movement act to actually promote the coming of Armageddon?
My tuppence worth: many of those fundies seem to want it both ways. They want the EndTimes(TM) to hurry up and arrive, but very few of them voted for (or admitted to voting for) Obama the Antichrist Mooslim Commie Fascist Homo-Lover(TM), who you think would be a good choice to speed things up.
Buz, what's your take on this? I already know your general opinion of our President and Commander-in-Chief, so you don't need to repeat yourself there. But is his presence in the White House speeding up the fulfillment of your preferred prophecies?

"God is Santa Claus for adults."
- Mad Kallie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Adminnemooseus, posted 03-24-2011 3:34 AM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024