What IS evidence of design? (CLOSING STATEMENTS ONLY)

What should have caught your attention and it obviously still has not, is that IC is a lesser component (a residual) of ID evidence deduced logically by an examination of the actual physical world. Order and purpose are exacally that, order and purpose. No approval on your part or a demonstration of or by a designer is required for evidence to be simply logical evidence. its evidence because its completley logical and testable as evidence, a designer, sight unseenIC may simply be a complicated way of explaining an otherwise simple logical argument, the likes of which is irrefutable. This is why ID has and will stand any examination or test of time. Its logical, applicable and very demonstratable.That is if you could only understand what constitues evidence. Tell me plainly dude can you?Good day mateDawn BertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.

As I beg Percys indulgence to offer a summation of sorts, the type of evidence needed has been indirectly implied in this thread. It has been indirectly implied that while we may not see a designer and we cannot see a designer designing, that is not necessary for order, to be ACTUAL solid evidence of designAll that is required is that order exists the same as the principles of gravity exist for us to observe and evaluate its effects and ultimately its valid conclusions. The "evidence" exists in what is valid and demonstratableThe question is not is order evidence of a DESIGNER, but is order evidence of DESIGN and ofcourse it is from every possible angle, physically, logically and evidentially. there is no other category where it can be scrutinized or evaluatedAnyone beliving that a valid "problem" exists with such reasoning or its conclusions is free to demonstrate otherwiseDawn BertotEdited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.