I think NoNukes and I agree with Cavediver that as observed from Earth,
But you said, In reference to my comment: ''I took this as meaning from our point of view, if we observe 4 objects, the two far ones will move away from each other faster then the two closer ones from each other.''
Along a single line of sight this would be true, trivially true in fact. It wouldn't be possible for it to be any other way.
Nonukes replied:
It isn't true at all. Assuming that the expansion is isotropic, then space between the pair of points expands at a rate proportional to the current separation of the pairs of points. The distance from us to the pair of points is not relevant.
And Cavediver replied:
And actually it is, observationally, but opposite to what has been suggested. Distant pairs of objects will be observed to expand away from each other more slowly than similarly separated pairs that are closer, as the more distant pair are being more red-shifted.
Each successively contradict each other.
two distant objects at radial distances x1 < x2 will have a smaller measured radial Δv than two closer objects of the same radial separation.
But this seems to contradict what you said in post no12, which I took as meaning that farther objects would have a greater radial Δv (and, I think Nonukes interpreted your no12 as meaning this as well)
Ignoring local motion, two objects at separation x from each other will be retreating from one another at the exact same velocity no matter where they are in the universe.
Which is exactly what I said in message no3: ''Objects farther away move faster away from us then closer objects, but not from each other.''