|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What happened to all the dead rotting carcasses? | |||||||||||||||||||
Jesuslover153 Inactive Member |
I do not see fossils as being irrelevant to the issues of continental drift... or the theory that I am proposing of two cataclysmic events...
I have to wonder if the 'older' appearing mountain ranges are older by about a few hundred years, but they were covered fully in water.. the newer mountains were created when the earth was struck and the surface became extremely elasticy as it expanded into its current positions... I prupose the impact area is the 'pacific plate', and the fault lines or mountain ridges in the oceans are the breaking points of where the earth seperated when it reached its maximum expansion... this could explain the magnetised particles on either side of these ridges... This could also lead to the assumption that pre-Babylon and pre-flood our oceans were not so deep.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
lpetrich Inactive Member |
Except that Pangaea had existed around 200 million years ago, and an earlier supercontinent, Rodinia, existed about 1 billion - 800 million years ago. There is a possible even older one that would have existed around 1.5 billion years ago.
And humanity was not around back then. Our ancestors were therapsid mammal-like reptiles when Pangaea existed, and protozoans when the earlier supercontinents existed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Pringlesguy7 Inactive Member |
i know im not a biblical scholar....but if i were to guess, i would have to say that there were probably not millions upon millions of people on the earth in Noah's days.Genesis 5 has Noahs geneology from Adam, and it doesnt appear to me that hundreds of millions of people were on the earth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
John Inactive Member |
But there would have been hundreds of millions of dead humans and animals. Although the Bible doesn't really say how many creatures were alive, there had to have been hundreds of millions-- billions-- of animals to account for what is found in the fossil record. The fossil record, remember, is interpretted by creationists to be almost entirely the result of the flood. Everything in the record had to have been alive at the time of the flood.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cthulhu Member (Idle past 5882 days) Posts: 273 From: Roe Dyelin Joined: |
I was kinda hungry...
------------------Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
reddish Inactive Member |
Goddamn you Cthulhu!! How dare you eat those poor defenseless dinosaurs!?! I will personally go down to the bottom of the ocean and stab you (in the face).
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cthulhu Member (Idle past 5882 days) Posts: 273 From: Roe Dyelin Joined: |
How can I damn myself?
------------------Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
You're not a god, you're just a huge squishy thing-from-outer-space.
Don't get uppity just because a bunch of degenerates and a few fish-things worship you. {OK, enough now - Adminnemooseus} [This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 10-09-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
some_guy Inactive Member |
it says in the bible the flood lasted for 150 days (genesis 7:24)
im curious as to how long a dead carcas would last in the ocean only due to rotting. And what about marine predators, wouldn't they have be feasting this whole time. just some possibilities.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
reddish Inactive Member |
I wouldn't take the Bible literally. I believe that the story of the flood is not about a global flood. Back in Noah's time, if the flood covered all of Mesopotamia, Noah would say it was the whole world. If covered the tops of the mountains in Israel and Turkey they would the highest mountains on Earth. Of course, it could just be a metaphor that I don't understand.
How can I damn myself?
You keep running your mouth and Nyarlathotep and I will come over to house and kick your extra terrestrial ass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
And what about marine predators, wouldn't they have be feasting this whole time. Nope. They'd be dead. The water would be too salty for the freshwater predators and not salty enough for the marine predators.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
quote:Unfortuantely, there would have been no marine predators. All that fresh flood water would have diluted the oceans so that the marine fish would have died. Unless, of course, the flood water had ocean-salinity - then all the fresh water fish would have died. Seems either way that Noah would have had to have pretty good aquarium equipment on that ark.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Trump won  Suspended Member (Idle past 1270 days) Posts: 1928 Joined: |
We've gone over this!!!! Schrafs thread I think..
[This message has been edited by messenjaH, 10-09-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||
some_guy Inactive Member |
obviously if someone beleives the biblical flood than they believe that not all the ocean predators died, cuz if they did then none would be here now. There would be no fish and our ocean should be dead by that reconing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: |
But others have described the events of the flood in ways that would destroy the ocean predators (well in fact destroy everything including the ark.
Without all the events they describe then the flood couldn't create all the geology we see (and can't even with these events). This isn't a flood thread (just the bodies ). Go to the flood threads and try to get it sorted out. The conclusion is that the flood could not and did not happen. Period.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024