Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Mutational Problem

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mutational Problem
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 20 (599261)
01-06-2011 4:45 AM 		Reply to: Message 5 by Jon
01-06-2011 3:49 AM

Re: Irrelevant Argument
I guess what you are trying to say is that it would not falsify the 'fact' of evolution.
​
But if he was right it would certainly falsify the Neo-Darwinian theory of evolution. In other words, their would need to have another mechanism (or simply an add-on) to Mutations+NS = Evolution.
​
So no, his argument isn't irrelevant. It is simply saying: ''Yeah, I know you say this evolved into that, but the mechanism you are proposing couldn't have done it''.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Jon, posted 01-06-2011 3:49 AM Jon has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Jon, posted 01-06-2011 11:15 AM slevesque has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024