BD writes:
The universe is either chaos or ordered.
The universe should be described as
both ordered
and chaotic, as they are not mutually exclusive in scientific parlance.
BD writes:
Chaos could be described as a lack of a plan, a lack of consistency, a lack of form, a lack of structure of organization or of meaning.
But that would be incorrect.
I think that you are knowingly conflating the common definition of chaos with the scientific definition of chaos which is:
quote:
Chaotic systems consequently appear disordered and random. However, they are actually deterministic systems governed by physical or mathematical laws, and so are completely predictable given perfect knowledge of the initial conditions.
BD writes:
Order could be described as structure, as consistency, as form, as organization, as observable,
verifiable forms of meaning.
It could be described as "verifiable forms of meaning" but that would be incorrect.
But I suspect that you are intentionally mis-using the word 'order', when you actually want to use the word 'design'.
BD writes:
From our observable experience we know that order is more likely when something is intelligently crafted, whereas chaos is more likely when there is no intelligence at work.
From my 'observable experience' I know that order is not reliant on intelligence.
But again I suspect that you are intentionally mis-using the word 'order', when you actually want to use the word 'design'.
BD writes:
Our universe appears to have order based on our observations, therefore it is more likely to be derived from an intelligent source.
This conclusion is completely undermined by its false premises.
BD writes:
God is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore a God is likely.
quote:
Allah is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Allah is likely.
Thor is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Thor is likely.
Human is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore a human is likely.
Lassie is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Lassie is likely.
You have ended up doing nothing more than reason that intelligence possibly exists.
BD writes:
Thank you for showing me the way Panda! You are indeed enlightened.
That is a non-sequitur.
Even your insults are illogical.
Edited by Panda, : typos