Life on other Planets?

The logic is quite simple.1) Is there evidence of physical life? Yes.
2) Is there evidence of physical life on a planet? Yes - Earth.
3) Is there evidence of other planets? Yes.
4) Could physical life exist on those other planets? It is possible.or1) Is there evidence of meta-physical life? No.It is not too difficult to understand.

The universe should be described as both ordered and chaotic, as they are not mutually exclusive in scientific parlance. But that would be incorrect.
I think that you are knowingly conflating the common definition of chaos with the scientific definition of chaos which is:

quote:

---

Chaotic systems consequently appear disordered and random. However, they are actually deterministic systems governed by physical or mathematical laws, and so are completely predictable given perfect knowledge of the initial conditions.

---

It could be described as "verifiable forms of meaning" but that would be incorrect.
But I suspect that you are intentionally mis-using the word 'order', when you actually want to use the word 'design'. From my 'observable experience' I know that order is not reliant on intelligence.
But again I suspect that you are intentionally mis-using the word 'order', when you actually want to use the word 'design'. This conclusion is completely undermined by its false premises.

quote:

---

Allah is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Allah is likely.
Thor is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Thor is likely.
Human is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore a human is likely.
Lassie is the name people give to an intelligent source, therefore Lassie is likely.

---

You have ended up doing nothing more than reason that intelligence possibly exists. That is a non-sequitur.
Even your insults are illogical.Edited by Panda, : typos

Thanks for the link. 4.
(initial capital letter) the personification of this in any of several ancient Greek myths.
5.
Obsolete. a chasm or abyss.

​

The behavior of systems that follow deterministic laws but appear random and unpredictable. Chaotic systems very are sensitive to initial conditions; small changes in those conditions can lead to quite different outcomes. One example of chaotic behavior is the flow of air in conditions of turbulence.

​

A new branch of science that deals with systems whose evolution depends very sensitively upon the initial conditions. Turbulent flows of fluids (such as white water in a river) and the prediction of the weather are two areas where chaos theory has been applied with some success.

​

A property of some non-linear dynamic systems which exhibit sensitive dependence on initial conditions. This means that there are initial states which evolve within some finite time to states whose separation in one or more dimensions of state space depends, in an average sense, exponentially on their initial separation. You intentionally didn't list the other meanings as that would have undermined your point.
If you have to lie to make a point, then that point is invalid. Which makes it easy for everyone as words only have one meaning.
Oh no, they don't - but at least we can read your mind to find out which meaning you are using.
Oh no, we can't - but at least we can use the context to identify which meaning you are using.
Oh no, we can't - as you use which ever meaning you feel like, regardless of the context. I addressed all of the points you raised in your original message, but you think you can ignore my replies and start asking more facile questions.
If you do not have the decency to address my responses then you are again being intentionally dishonest when debating.If only Christianity had some requirement for honesty or maybe some kind of moral guide.
But it would seem not, judging by your behaviour.

Edited by Panda, : Hidden Edited by Panda, : No reason given.