Dawn Bertot writes:
I assume that Mr Darwin observed things long before he went to the next step correct?
Well, he spent a lot of years thinking about his observations, trying to figure out what they meant. During those years he collected many more observations and cataloged everything meticulously.
His evaluations had to involve presuppositions (SMs)and then conclusions, correct?
As others have pointed out presuppositions and the Scientific Method are not synonyms.
If I remember correctly Darwin's presupposition, when he start on his journey on the Beagle, was that the god of the Bible had created everything like it says in Genesis. The evidence he found did not confirm his presuppositions.
You see thats the problem. Most evolutionist, atleast the hard core ones, assume that thier position involves neither presuppositions or conclusions, but happily and logically they do.
Really? Could you give me some examples?
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley