P writes
In short, we have great faith in the methods by which science acquires its "opinions". This faith is justified because, generally, scientific explanations work.
Ringo writes
Isn't that what the thread is all about? As long as our methods work, what difference does it make if they're "wrong"?
When F. F, Bruce was writing his book, 'The New Testament Douments, are they reliable', one of his friends, that was used to review his research, asked "reliable as what"?
I would ask, scientific explanations work at demonstrating what? How a tree works? What exacally do they work to do and what questions concening the designer do they solve?
You have faith in the Scientific explanations, to what end?
Dawn Bertot
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Dawn Bertot, : No reason given.