Jar:
Nonsense.
Biblical Creationism explains nothing.
BarackZero:
Where did I mention Biblical Creationism?
Please point out that post.
Your error is the perennial error of Darwinists everywhere.
"If you don't have something better, don't say a word about Darwinism."
Sorry, but that is NOT science.
Darwinism may well be the best we have today. I do not contest that point. What I do contest is that Darwinists refuse to consider any points contrary to their insistent dogma. Sounds to me like Albert Einstein telling George LeMaitre that his theory of a Primordial Atom is just no good, because they couldn't have a beginning.
Nossir, it was an eternal and unchanging universe, by golly.
ALL SCIENTISTS agreed!
Jar:
The ONLY theory that is available currently that does explain the variety of life we see today as well as the FACT of Evolution is the Theory of Evolution.
Speaking to you as one Christian to another, supporting Biblical Creationism does absolutely nothing but force ignorance upon our children and is a denial to use the gifts the very GOD you seem to believe in gave you.
Barack:
There you go again, making statements and then foisting them upon me. Terribly unscientific of you.
Now if you wish to discuss who is "forcing ignorance" upon whom, you should at least begin with something factual - something we can both agree on, which I said. This you failed miserably to do.
And you call yourself a "Christian"?
Now, as to which of us understands science and reality better, I'll go first.
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy concerns itself with identifying organic compounds by measuring the resonance signals emitted by the tested hydrogen compound relative to tetramethyl silane, or TMS, which is arbitrarily 0.
I have conducted research while using an NMR.
Biblical Creationism is not a subject I discuss. YOU brought it up.
I deal with science.