rather it will use the current secular principles and rules to show that act of creation can and should be considered science.
How would that work? When each of your creation mechanisms are summarized fully by "God said," it is a bit tough to replicate those results in a Petri dish. Science deals with experimentation and replication of results pretty much of everywhere it goes - even in palaeontology. Dig up an
Ichthyostega, and go back to Greenland the next summer to dig for more, and then go to Nunavut and look for
Tiktallik in slightly newer rock.
No matter how many times you read Genesis in your preferred translation, the same words are there. That's repitition, not replication.
"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons,
ca. 830 AD