Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

UFO's or Demons

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   UFO's or Demons
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 16 of 76 (570335)
07-27-2010 4:35 AM 		Reply to: Message 14 by DBlevins
07-26-2010 11:03 PM

Re: Sense?
You should contact Faith then. If I recall correctly, she thinks that UFO's are demons, or related to demons in some way.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by DBlevins, posted 07-26-2010 11:03 PM DBlevins has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by DBlevins, posted 07-27-2010 7:19 PM Huntard has not replied
  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 54 of 76 (572497)
08-06-2010 8:06 AM 		Reply to: Message 53 by riVeRraT
08-06-2010 7:43 AM

Re: Sense?
riVeRraT writes:
​
There is evidence that God exists, subjective evidence, which at one point in time was objective.
Huh? How does objective evidence turn into subjective evidence?
​
Edited by Huntard, : Did quote wrong
This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 08-06-2010 7:43 AM riVeRraT has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by riVeRraT, posted 08-06-2010 11:45 PM Huntard has not replied
  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 60 of 76 (572590)
08-06-2010 5:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 59 by onifre
08-06-2010 5:03 PM

Neil Degrasse Tyson says it best
Title says it all really, here's Neil Degrasse Tyson explaining about ufo's and shit:
​
​
Linky
This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by onifre, posted 08-06-2010 5:03 PM onifre has seen this message but not replied
  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 62 of 76 (572594)
08-06-2010 5:21 PM 		Reply to: Message 61 by DBlevins
08-06-2010 5:15 PM

Re: Ufo's sans aliens?
DBlevins writes:
​
I guess I am confused by the 'evidence' portion of the statement. Obviously there will always be unidentified flying objects. Why make the point that evidence exists of something you see everyday?
To contrast it with something for which evidence is never seen (god), is my guess.
​
It seems like overkill and confuses poeple who identify ufo's in the popular sense of 'alien flying objects.
People who do that commit a massive logical fallacy.
​
I'd be more likely to put RR's 'ufo's' into the alien ufo slot, considering he seems to feel that they are driven by demons and not aliens. I guess I am saying, 'What's the difference between an alien driven ufo and a demon driven one?'
None, they're both equally faulty conclusions.
​
I understand your position that ufo's, by definition exist, but I think there is a not so subtle difference between what you are saying and what RR believes.
'Tis not our fault he commits a logical fallacy.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by DBlevins, posted 08-06-2010 5:15 PM DBlevins has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by riVeRraT, posted 08-07-2010 12:07 AM Huntard has replied
  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2326 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008

Normal Thread Display
Message 71 of 76 (572688)
08-07-2010 3:34 AM 		Reply to: Message 68 by riVeRraT
08-07-2010 12:07 AM

Re: Ufo's sans aliens?
riVeRraT writes:
​
Totally off track.
Really? I think Jar would be the arbiter of that, he hasn't come forward to say that that wasn't the reason he made the comparison
​
palm face plant***
Do you mean Facepalm?
​
You my friend are a retard.
Thank you. *drools a little*
​
The only logical fallacy around here is you.
Cool!
​
How could you take DBlevins conclusion, and label it riverrat's, then accuse me of a logical fallacy when he has no clue what I am talking about, because he can't see through his own short comings?
I'm sorry, what? I said that both the conclusion that aliens or demons are the source for unidentified (this is the important word here) flying objects, are equally faulty. Because no one know what those things were, that's what unidentified means. Or are you going to tell me you have evidence that either of them are responsible for UFO's?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by riVeRraT, posted 08-07-2010 12:07 AM riVeRraT has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024