dinosaur and human co-existence

Wow, that's some nice conjecture. You know what would make it really neat? Some friggin' evidence instead of wild made up ridiculous fairytales.Seriously, this is the best you can come up with? Made up stuff? Pure friggin' magic? I can only assume you think us all complete retards, if you think this drivel will convince anyone with half a brain.... Sheesh...

No. Have you learned anything in your time here? The ToE is the best explanation for all the evidence we see, Buz. How many times do we have to tell you this? Why would this be a problem for us, pray tell? Does anyone here say that if snakes coexisted with dinosaurs, they had to have died along with them as well? What a weird thing to claim, given the evidence is suggesting this is far from the case.

And it always seems to be true as well, imagine that. Why? You're not showing any evidence. There's literally nothing to debunk, you haven't even shown anything. All that's left for me is to point out the rather obvious fact you have misrepresented science and evolution once again Really? Allow me to break down your response: Here, you say you haven't yet read all response in this thread. Ok, that's clear. Here you say the same thing twice, that you currently haven't. Well duh you said that in your initial sentence, no need to repeat it twice. You are now going to state something we have failed to do, in your eyes. This is the thing we failed to do, refute this so called "co-existant/survival problem" of ours. Here you say that you have a practical solution to the "co-existant/survival problem".Now, My response to this was pointing out to you that we have no "co-existant/survival problem", since no one here claims it is a problem for snakes or other reptiles to have co existed with dinosaurs, and yet have survived the extinction event that led to the disappearance of the dinosaurs.Clear enough for ya?

Of course not. As you can see Buz is quite a long participant here on these boards. He's been in countless discussions about ToE and all related stuff, every time we've told him that the ToE is not a presupposition from which the evidence is interpreted, we have shown him how this is not the case, yet he chooses to say it again here. That's what I'm pointing out.We don't do it like creationists do, who indeed use the method of saying "it is so so it is so".Got anything useful to add to the discussion, by the way?

It has been explained to you at least ten times now in this very thread that dinosaurs weren't the only group that went extinct in the K-T event.In Dr. Adequate's case, he provided some examples in Message 151: Will you finally own up to the fact that dinosaurs weren't the only group that went extinct in the K-T event, or will you continue to lie about it? Yes, lie, since you have been shown that you are wrong, yet continue to say this stuff anyway.