Fossils, strata and the flood

Honey, sweetie, I've presented the evidence which you are all ignoring. You can't deal with it, you can't wrap your mind around it. Everything you are calling evidence is irrelevant in the light of what I've pointed out to you. It is really pathetic what you are all doing, saddest thing I've ever encountered.And by the way I don't read the creationists, but I have read quite a bit about geology. I can think independently, which obviously you can't. I read a bio of Hutton too. Interesting how 18th century thinking simply became the standard. He looked at a formation and said it had to be old. And geo science hasn't progressed any since then. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

No, dear, what I am saying is that if geological theory is correct that is what MUST have happened. They don't think it happened but it is what MUST have happened if it all built up slowly over billions of years. It is what MUST have happened if you actually LOOK at the depth of the strata all over the earth, their neat horizontality and parallel form, and then THINK for a change. That is, it just went on a-building until "recent" time when suddenly all the tectonic and weathering forces happened. Never happened before. IF their theory is correct.Just LOOK and THINK. Stop yammering and LOOK and THINK.But of course it isn't correct. It COULDN'T have happened that way.The strata COULDN'T have taken billions of years to form. The only thing that accounts for the obvious neatness of the strata to such a depth is a worldwide Flood.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Why don't you THINK for a change, honey darlin?