Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did God say it, or did you say it?
Peg
Member (Idle past 4960 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 114 of 127 (550226)
03-13-2010 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by Kapyong
03-13-2010 4:25 PM


Re: Context or Not
Hi Kapyong,
i noticed your bible.org are focusing on the word 'is'
really they should be focusing on the greek expression 'god-breathed'
This is an expression similar to one found at Psalms 33:6 "by the word of God the heavens themselves were made, and by the spirit [or breath] of his mouth all their army.
Paul was saying that the holy scriptures (yes he was refering to the OT) were 'God-Breathed' this means that God brought them into existence thru his spirit in the same way he brought the universe into existence. So they are not the work simply of men, but were directed works by God.
God is the arcitect, men are simply the laborers.
Now i dont beleive the critics who claim Paul did not write the books of timothy, or that they were written in the 2nd century, so im not going to comment on that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Kapyong, posted 03-13-2010 4:25 PM Kapyong has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Kapyong, posted 03-18-2010 5:49 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4960 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 116 of 127 (550351)
03-15-2010 1:26 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by killinghurts
03-14-2010 9:09 PM


Re: Context or Not
killinghurts writes:
So you admit that no one person knows the absolute truth, and to tell someone otherwise is a lie.
Do you find it strange when religions claim "the truth", when in your own words, you have described it as unattainable due to our own reasoning and knowledge?
i certainly didnt describe it as unattainable.
If you get your water from a clean source, the water will be clean. If you get your water from a dirty source, it will be dirty.
God always provides an avenue to understanding. You just have to find the avenue he uses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by killinghurts, posted 03-14-2010 9:09 PM killinghurts has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by killinghurts, posted 03-15-2010 11:16 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4960 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 118 of 127 (550521)
03-16-2010 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by killinghurts
03-15-2010 11:16 PM


Re: Context or Not
killinghurts writes:
How do you know the water source is clean?
you test it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by killinghurts, posted 03-15-2010 11:16 PM killinghurts has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by killinghurts, posted 03-16-2010 1:18 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4960 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 120 of 127 (550533)
03-16-2010 3:37 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by killinghurts
03-16-2010 1:18 AM


Re: Context or Not
killinghurts writes:
How do we test the understanding (given by humans) is actually what God meant?
You study the bible, you find out what its message is, you learn what Gods purpose is. Then, based on your understanding thus far you consider any teachings/doctrines in light of the original meaning of the language used, you compare that to the context of the passage, you corroborate that with other passages that discuss the same subject and after doing all that you should be able to determine if the teaching you've learnt is true or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by killinghurts, posted 03-16-2010 1:18 AM killinghurts has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Theodoric, posted 03-16-2010 11:16 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 124 by killinghurts, posted 03-17-2010 9:07 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4960 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 123 of 127 (550734)
03-17-2010 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by greyseal
03-16-2010 8:40 AM


Re: opinion and source
greyseal writes:
I realise you're being honest, also with yourself, which is wonderful - but if your reasoning is coloured by your own opinion, then your words are your words, not your god's.
quite right. If im giving my own opinion, then i'm expanding which is definately not Gods words.
But this is what happens when people start asking questions that the bible does not provide an answer to. They have to speculate. Now I dont mind them doing that so long as they let people know they are speculating or giving their own opinion.
greyseal writes:
Why could god, most powerful, most high, omnimax being that he is, not know how to use evolution?
Here you are asking a question to a subject which is not mentioned in the bible. This is going to cause me to speculate... just warning you in advance.
God did not say "I did not use evolution" but i'm going to 'speculate' that he did not use it based on what he DID say.
The genesis account tells us that God 'created' living things according to their kinds. He first made the sea creatures 'according to their kinds' . Nowhere does genesis say that evolution was a part of the process. Nowhere does it say that God made a living organism that slowly became a multitude of other creatures and eventually turned into the flying creatures and the land animals.
So there is no way im going to attribute this idea of evolution to Gods creations. According to Genesis he made them whole. He made them male and female which indicates, not evolution, but creation.
greyseal writes:
indeed, but these are YOUR words, not god's - I'm not arguing that your interpretation cannot be correct, but I am pointing out that you HAVE an interpretation
yes this is true. But you have to understand that when people start asking quesitons about things not mentioned in the bible, then a little speculation on those subjects is required to answer the questions.
Perhaps it would be best for believers to just not answer such quesitons...but this means then that only those who are non believers will be speculating on the bible...a book that they generally do not understand and know little about. I think believers would rather speculatate in order to defend the bible rather then allow others to rubbish it. (i'm not saying you are doing that btw)
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by greyseal, posted 03-16-2010 8:40 AM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by greyseal, posted 03-18-2010 5:02 AM Peg has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024