Hello,
Source? or is this another of your statements you make that you have no evidence for.
Actually there is a lot. In fact the idea that the primative atmosphere was reducing is seriously question today yet biology textbooks tell us that it is a fact. The idea that molecules can replicate without the help from other molecules has been descrideted yet biology textbook stell us that it is a fact,the idea that protein can formed without the help from DNA has been discredited, yet biology textbooks tell us that is a fact. Satisfy?
There is no discussion as to the validity/FACT of evolution in scientific circles. The only thing that is debated/argued/questioned: is the manner in which it occurs.
Actually Im not really sure if you understand what you are talking about. The fact that there is wide disagreement among elite scientific figures, can be considered that they dont have yet the satisfactory explanation of how life began. Let me ask you, are therestill debate, argue ,question that the earth is round? Are there still debate, question , argue, that gravity cause objects to fall downward? These things are considered as facts to some degree,that is why we dont heared any scientistist arguing or questioning them. How about evolution? You yourself implied that there are still contreversies because you there are still "argued/questioned" yet you considered them as fact. Iam confused. Very confused.
If behe ever had a legitimately peer reviewed paper on anything, i would consider him a legitimate source. until then? He is nothing.
Behe has a Ph.D in Biochemistry and won the zigma prizes for best thesis. The real reason why you dont read his argument published in prestigious scientific journals like Nature, New Scientist,The Scientific American,etc, its not because he have no repliesbut its because his replieswas prevented to occured by many die hard Darwinist. I understand that peer review is the method being use to determine the correctness of scientific arguments but in the case of Behe that method is not fair. You might ask why. Because all the reviewers believe in evolution and they have a prejudiced towards ID. It is like throwing sheep to the cave of lion and hoping to come out.
Edited by traste, : correcting grammar