Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9219 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: KING IYK
Post Volume: Total: 920,774 Year: 1,096/6,935 Month: 377/719 Week: 19/146 Day: 0/19 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution in reverse
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 1127 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 1 of 4 (532345)
10-22-2009 9:22 PM


I often hear, in arguments against the flud, that if it were true, there would have had to have been super evolution and in reverse.
I don't quite get what is meant by saying it would have to be in reverse.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 10-22-2009 10:21 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 1127 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 4 of 4 (532353)
10-22-2009 10:24 PM


There is a reason I posted the original where I did. I am just asking a simple question. I did not intend for this to be a debate topic.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025