Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pterodactyl Intermediate
tuffers
Member (Idle past 5306 days)
Posts: 92
From: Norwich, UK
Joined: 07-20-2009


Message 8 of 13 (530863)
10-15-2009 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by New Cat's Eye
10-14-2009 3:19 PM


Thank you
Hi Catholic Scientist
I just want to thank you for posting the link to the Daily Mail article. I haven't laughed quite so much at someone's complete ignorance for ages.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-14-2009 3:19 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Larni, posted 10-15-2009 12:33 PM tuffers has not replied
 Message 10 by caffeine, posted 10-16-2009 5:55 AM tuffers has replied

  
tuffers
Member (Idle past 5306 days)
Posts: 92
From: Norwich, UK
Joined: 07-20-2009


Message 11 of 13 (531102)
10-16-2009 6:53 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by caffeine
10-16-2009 5:55 AM


Re: The wonders of the Daily Mail
Thanks for that Mail Watch link, I'll put it straight in my "favourites".
Before we get slapped on the wrist for going off-topic, the funniest (or most disturbing) thing I ever saw in the Daily Mail was about 10 years ago. It was during the big media scare about paedophiles running amoke in society. There was a huge front page article about how terrible child pornography is (and I certainly don't disagree on that, although the whole paedophile thing was over-hyped) but then in the Health Section on the centre pages they had a full centre-fold photograph of a naked man holding a naked child against his genitals! I have no idea what that is supposed to do with the subject of Health! The photo was very styled and obviously supposed to be a something the readers would enjoy looking at. What the *@$# was going on there?!?
Your account of their obsession with a 3-year-old girl only seems to emphasise that something very disturbing is going on at that paper.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by caffeine, posted 10-16-2009 5:55 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024