Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   faith in evolution
joz
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 32 (5219)
02-21-2002 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by toff
02-21-2002 10:10 AM


quote:
Originally posted by toff:
Nobody has ever been able to find any.
While I disagree with his line of reasoning John Searles attacks on functionalism are clearly non-trivial....
You would do well to acquaint yourself with his concept of intentionality as expressed in his "chineese room" argument.....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by toff, posted 02-21-2002 10:10 AM toff has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by toff, posted 02-22-2002 4:24 AM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 32 (5225)
02-21-2002 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Brad McFall
02-21-2002 11:27 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
Do you mean by fancied quantum compters that don't exist? and whose construction without close unity with science of genetics can cause a collapse of the/a food web, potentially (in worst case)??
Au contraire Brad they do exsist...
http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/bios.nsf/pages/quantum.html
So what was that about the collapse of the/a food web?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Brad McFall, posted 02-21-2002 11:27 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Brad McFall, posted 04-08-2002 2:24 PM joz has not replied

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 32 (7531)
03-21-2002 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Darwin Storm
03-21-2002 12:01 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Darwin Storm:
Here is a morality question. If we create sentient computers, would sociey give them rights? How would we treat them? Would we just create a new form of slavery? As an atheist, I don't believe in a soul. However, I have an underlying appreciation for sentience. If we are able to create a sentient computer, I believe we have a moral obligation to grant such a being the same rights we would accord a human. Just curious what others view on this would be.
Thats just what used to disturb me about Asimovs robot stories and his "three laws of robotics", the fact that sentient entities were created with no motivation but to serve their creators struck me as being morally no better than slavery on the part of those concerned with their manufacture and use....
Probably why I enjoyed "That thou art mindful of him" so much. Rather than finding it disturbing, as so many seem to, I found the robots rationalisation of themselves as being human, thus the three laws of robotics become the three laws of humanics, and by their mental and physical superiority a superior kind of human comforting in the sense that by exercising their capacity for logic they freed themselves of their built in servitude....
(though I`m not really that keen on a bunch of super metal mickeys taking over the world....)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Darwin Storm, posted 03-21-2002 12:01 AM Darwin Storm has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024