Human genome is degrading, together with all other living genomes.
But you have provided no evidence to show that this is the case. Repeated claims do not constitute evidence and... (well, see tagline).
And those folks who are most familiar with the scientific evidence on this issue (biologists) don't agree with you by an overwhelming number.
Curious: only biblical literalists follow and promote your "degrading" argument.
You may try to claim that you are pursuing science, but when 99.9% of scientists disagree with you that is a specious claim.
If you really, really are pursuing science you are so far out on the fringe you couldn't see the mainstream with the Hubble.
But I still think you are pushing religion, adhering to the bible as accurate on this point in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
(A related question: for how long has the human genome been degrading? And what is the position of
Homo ergaster and
H. neanderthalis in relation to either the global flood or the tower of Babel incident? Do you see them as products of "devolution" after a perfect creation represented by Adam and Eve?)
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.