Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   adding a quotes feature
Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 5 of 11 (514212)
07-04-2009 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
07-04-2009 6:14 PM


Re: Why we killed "reply quote"
Forum Rule 5
quote:
Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided. Make the argument in your own words and use links as supporting references.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-04-2009 6:14 PM Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 11 of 11 (514275)
07-05-2009 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Percy
07-05-2009 9:11 AM


Re: Another Problem With Reply Quote
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
Someone else writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
This can go on ad infinitum:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
Someone else writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
This can go on ad infinitum:
I thought this feature would be neat when I first conceived it because no other forum software had it. Their reply/quote feature wasn't recursive, and so interior quotes had to be filtered out. But recursion had an unintended consequence: people would indiscriminately use it to reply and not remove any text at all, and things would get worse and worse:
Someone else writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
Someone else writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
This can go on ad infinitum:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
Someone else writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
Percy writes:
This forum's software's reply/quote feature is a bit too powerful. It's what we experts call recursive. This means it can be invoked within itself. Allow me to demonstrate by first quoting me:
If all the above plus this sentence were a single message and someone were to use reply/quote on it then we would have:
This can go on ad infinitum:
I thought this feature would be neat when I first conceived it because no other forum software had it. Their reply/quote feature wasn't recursive, and so interior quotes had to be filtered out. But recursion had an unintended consequence: people would indiscriminately use it to reply and not remove any text at all, and things would get worse and worse:
Still, reply/quote will probably make a comeback at some point. On our todo list is a modification that would disallow recursive quoting beyond some level, and also disallow quotes longer than a certain limit.
--Percy
I know what you mean. I've seen some forums where this quotes-within-quotes-within-quotes were so prevalent that it was hard to actually see what words were the message.

People Eating Tasty Animals

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Percy, posted 07-05-2009 9:11 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024