EvC Forum: Intermediate forms now evidence against evolution, says creationist

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Intermediate forms now evidence against evolution, says creationist

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 6 of 20 (513041)
06-24-2009 12:08 PM

Reply to: Message 1 by caffeine
06-24-2009 6:42 AM

OMG, I've never thought of this before! Thank you for the link! I now know with absolute certainty that evolution is a disproven theory.

According to the theory of evolution, lots of "micro"evolution adds up to "macro"evolution. In other words, it's either mammal or reptilian. Proto-mammals can't exist.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 1 by caffeine, posted 06-24-2009 6:42 AM		caffeine has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 7 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 06-26-2009 8:24 AM		Taz has replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 8 of 20 (513220)
06-26-2009 12:24 PM

Reply to: Message 7 by Teapots&unicorns
06-26-2009 8:24 AM

Teapots writes:

I hope you're joking Taz.

What are you talking about? I am absolutely 100% not joking. For years I've been told that I'm not going to find a creature that's half dog and half monkey to link the two together because that's not how evolution works. Evolution is suppose to be so gradual that it's either all dog or all monkey. Now, you're telling me that something that's half monkey and half dog is evidence of evolution?

This is why most scientists don't believe in evolution and now an increasing number of scientists are turning toward the bible for truth.

People
Eating
Tasty
Animals

This message is a reply to:
	Message 7 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 06-26-2009 8:24 AM		Teapots&unicorns has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 9 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 06-26-2009 12:44 PM	Taz has replied
	Message 16 by bluescat48, posted 06-28-2009 6:29 AM	Taz has not replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 15 of 20 (513346)
06-28-2009 3:50 AM

Reply to: Message 9 by Teapots&unicorns
06-26-2009 12:44 PM

Re: Misguided

Crackpots&unicorns writes:

I said that I hoped you were joking because this is the evidence for evolution. I would like to point out that this animal is not half monkey and half dog as you mistakenly pointed out; it shares both mammilian and reptilic characteristics. Please keep that in mind.

Oh, and half mammal and half reptile is better how?

is completely false. This would be totally irrelevant evidence, as well as misguided. Gradual (note word choice) results in many transitional forms such as (bluntly- not canon/fact) 0.25 fish/0.75 mammal; 0.5 fish/0.5 mammal; 0.75 fish/0.25 mammal and so on. The whole point is that evolution works slowly, something that you don't seem to be getting.

So, somewhere in there I should be able to find .5fish/.5 mammal, right? And yet we don't have a single example of a creature with any kind of combination between fish and mammal. Evolution is a myth!

Contrary to your beliefs, 95% of all scientists hold evolution to be true.

Typical lies and propaganda by atheists and satanists! Evolution is a theory in crisis. Creation is truth.

This message is a reply to:
	Message 9 by Teapots&unicorns, posted 06-26-2009 12:44 PM		Teapots&unicorns has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 17 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 06-28-2009 8:53 AM	Taz has not replied
	Message 18 by AZPaul3, posted 06-28-2009 12:03 PM	Taz has not replied

Taz

Member (Idle past 3321 days)

Posts: 5069

From: Zerus

Joined: 07-18-2006

Normal Thread Display

Message 20 of 20 (513677)
07-01-2009 1:43 AM

Reply to: Message 19 by dwise1
06-28-2009 4:01 PM

The Wise One writes:

Seems I'd been hearing that claim of theirs from the start ... or at least ever since I started around 1980. Along with their list of "scientists who are creationists" -- I always got a chuckle out their including one or two "food scientists"; I wonder whether they had contributed that lame "how did food evolve?" claim that shows up occasionally.

I googled "how did food evolve?" and got this thread as the top result. Interesting and entertaining read, to say the least!

This message is a reply to:
	Message 19 by dwise1, posted 06-28-2009 4:01 PM		dwise1 has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	nwr, Theodoric
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0