It seems that New Scientists was sued for libel, and they had to take the article down. Reading the article, I could not find anything inacurate in it.
I find it interesting that someone would take offence at something that does not contain any inacuracies.
For me, the link you provided is to a webpage that says that they've removed the article on the advice of their lawyers. Did you read the article in the print edition?
Anyway, I found the article in the print edition and used a couple phrases from it to find a copy that had been posted on the web over at a Google group called Atheism vs Christianity:
I've just read the article and i just can't see what is libelous about it from a legal point of view. Maybe some creationists or Idist could tell us what's wrong with this article.
On another related note,I wonder why creationists pays so much for lawyers instead of research. Maybe they would get more results and publications in scientific journals if they didn't spend most of their money in courts.
What a coincidence. I watched the Atheist Experience's new show yesterday, and they brought this up too, though i don't recall them saying it was censored.