Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   YEC Geologic Column - Created with apparent age?
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 76 of 82 (219648)
06-26-2005 12:33 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Philip
06-25-2005 11:00 PM


Re: Converting to geological YECism
Rox, I'm sure perhaps one or two honest ones awakened to YECism in graduate-level geology after noting "Fish fossils" in your bodacious mountain-tops of Colorado.
I know of none. What actually happens is that as one becomes more familiar with the science of geology it becomes virtually impossible to adhere to YECism. Glen Morton has an interesting story to tell about this. Maybe someone has a link to it. He was once a YEC and slowly converted after working in the field where YEC dogma collided with functional mainstream science.
But here’s an interesting Freudian slip which sounds like geologist conspiracy. You stated: It's almost impossible to get a degree in geology and adhere to YECism. This is appalling. I certainly hope some lurker’s taxes aren’t funding such geological bigotry.
Not bigotry. Simple facts. You cannot rationalize the mountains of evidence for an old earth with the YEC doctrine. As Rox said, the only real way is to be a committed YEC in the first place. In fact some have said that they took degrees in geology simply to disprove mainstream science.
I converted to YECism during my freshman year at medical school after reading geological YECism for the first time in my life. I already possessed 2 science degrees: electronic engineering (AAS) and Psychology (BS). Up to then, I followed OECism. It was that old fundy "gap-theory" elaborating upon Gen. 1.1-3.
Currently, I hold an MS in biomedical science, have practiced podiatric medicine about 14 years, and have been board certified in podiatric surgery most of that period. I personally can’t conceive of any mega-ToE from any physiological perspective. Mutational NS is way-out for me.
Well, see: you're not a geologist!
At present I’m open to OEC because I don’t really know what TIME is. How about you, Rox? Do you or your geological authorities speculate anything cosmic about time and/or the primordial geosphere?
Speaking for myself, sure. That is part of a geologist's job, to create viable past scenarios that predict earth conditions.
...
6) Finally, such non-chaotic (excellent) geological formations (during their generation) parsimoniously suggest redemptive events permeated everywhere. In other words, geo-science proves that the handiwork of God and His Redeemer continued upon the geosphere even after the beginning.
I'm not sure I have a handle on 'excellent geological formations'. Why could they not suggest normal physical processes rather than 'redemptive events'? Are you saying that the deposition of beach sands constitutes some supernatural event and that we are somehow being rewarded with a beach? And you would call that a 'parsimonious explanation'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Philip, posted 06-25-2005 11:00 PM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Philip, posted 06-27-2005 11:55 AM edge has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1727 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 77 of 82 (219649)
06-26-2005 12:40 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by Philip
06-24-2005 5:05 PM


Re: Our Perception of Geological Time
Geology experts (like yourself) are aware that: Not all geologists subscribe to geological uniformatarianism; ...
Of course not. I am a catastrophist myself. Catastrophes are normal events in earth history. However, there are vast amounts of time between the catastrophes.
... a few YEC geologists buy into the catastrophic global flood model to explain many apparent geological flukes and geology’s vast sequence of understandable processes and events.
A few, eh? Is this some argument from lack of authority or something? Please find us just one who was not committed to YEC before becoming a geologist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Philip, posted 06-24-2005 5:05 PM Philip has not replied

  
roxrkool
Member (Idle past 1010 days)
Posts: 1497
From: Nevada
Joined: 03-23-2003


Message 78 of 82 (220004)
06-27-2005 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Philip
06-25-2005 11:00 PM


Re: Converting to geological YECism
Philip writes:
Rox, I'm sure perhaps one or two honest ones awakened to YECism in graduate-level geology after noting "Fish fossils" in your bodacious mountain-tops of Colorado.
If you knew anything about geology, you would see what a silly statement the above is. Fact is, I have never met one person who converted to 'awakened' to YECism as an undergraduate, much less in graduate school, but I have met several people who came in YECs and left old earth proponents. Some very good Christian friends.
But here’s an interesting Freudian slip which sounds like geologist conspiracy. You stated: It's almost impossible to get a degree in geology and adhere to YECism. This is appalling. I certainly hope some lurker’s taxes aren’t funding such geological bigotry.
Another silly statement by you. There is no need for an old earth conspiracy in the face of overwhelming evidence. One need only to look at the rocks, learn to read them, and there is no other answer.
People in college aren't stupid you know. And your baseless assumption that they are is offensive to every college person and graduate on this planet. Are YOU stupid? Did you swallow everything your college professor told you without first making sure it made sense?
I converted to YECism during my freshman year at medical school after reading geological YECism for the first time in my life.
Maybe while at college you should have taken a geology course as well. Then you'd realize how silly your statements above are.
I already possessed 2 science degrees: electronic engineering (AAS) and Psychology (BS). Up to then, I followed OECism. It was that old fundy "gap-theory" elaborating upon Gen. 1.1-3.
Currently, I hold an MS in biomedical science, have practiced podiatric medicine about 14 years, and have been board certified in podiatric surgery most of that period. I personally can’t conceive of any mega-ToE from any physiological perspective. Mutational NS is way-out for me.
Buy you never took any geology courses. You're not a geologist. Medical degrees and reading about geology does not a geologist make.
I have two science degrees, and I've worked as a professional geologist for 12 years. How would you feel about me questioning your education? Or your methods of doctoring? Or the theories you use everyday to treat and diagnose people?
How about you, Rox? Do you or your geological authorities speculate anything cosmic about time and/or the primordial geosphere?
Of course. What do you think we do all day at work? Debate YECs?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Philip, posted 06-25-2005 11:00 PM Philip has not replied

  
Philip
Member (Idle past 4744 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 79 of 82 (220005)
06-27-2005 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by edge
06-26-2005 12:33 AM


Re: Geological Excellencies?
Major de ja vou I’ve heard that song before, Edge. Your geologists deny your mega-ToE conspiracy (unconsciously perhaps) as do our biologists deny their mega-ToE conspiracy. Denying the problem or evading it is evil. Everyone innocently acts without sin when it comes to getting paid. I’m guilty too.
I see you’re from Colorado as well. And, because I have four other science degrees, a non-geologist YEC conversion was understandable?!# I personally don’t know many geologists at present (you, Moose, and Rox), let alone any geologists that converted to YECism in grad-school or pre-grad. So I may be wrong.
One Chemist (Behe, I think) seemed to vehemently convert to YECism while developing the concept of ICs. Will that suffice, Edge? Isn’t there someone in your literature who converted to YECism? Please don’t make me chase that rabbit. Surely one or two geologists in your camp turned Judas or something.
Back to the topic What’s doctorate geology have to do with IN THE BEGINNING anyway? I was hoping we might be talking about quarks and photons (or something see below) in a primordial geosphere, not arguments of geological strata. Please, Edge.
I’ve referred to non-chaotic geological formations as geological excellencies or excellent geological formations. I think Sir Isaac Newton and/or Jonathan Edwards introduced that term Excellency to refer to nature’s harmonies, symmetries, and proportions. The latter, Edwards, applied the term to redemptive metaphysical phenomena.
Such Excellencies denote beauty, beneficence, and a peculiar permanence conferred upon us melancholy creatures. Excellencies must be worth gawking at by any geological authority. Examples of ‘excellent geological formations’ might be:
1) Primordial excellent geological formations: Quarks, Photons, lower elements and their quantums The mystery of Orchestrated quantum mechanics commencing and sustaining matter The pre-universe and its beneficial relationship to our geosphere.
2) Then, excellent geological formations of higher elements and inorganic compounds, their excellent longevities (half-lives), and simple organic compounds.
3) Then, very excellent geological formations of complex organic and biochemical molecules along with their linked enzymes, DNA, RNA, etc. might even rate the term higher excellencies.
4) Finally, extremely excellent fossil formations of living things, and numerous other orchestrated geological harmonies, symmetries, and proportions.
Of course, geological authority doesn’t seem to have a handle on when its appropriate to gawk at primordial geological excellencies. Yet gawk geologists must, don’t you think? Even all geological authority must raise its hands in adoration to its Maker.
OFF TOPIC (and maybe in a "zone of his own") - DON'T REPLY TO - Adminnemooseus
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 06-27-2005 01:05 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by edge, posted 06-26-2005 12:33 AM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-27-2005 12:48 PM Philip has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 80 of 82 (220023)
06-27-2005 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Philip
06-27-2005 11:55 AM


Re: Geological Excellencies?
Philip - I have to file this one under "incoherant rant having very little to do with the theme of the topic". Stop it!
The non-admin mode has moved the Behe bit to another location.
Adminnemooseus

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Philip, posted 06-27-2005 11:55 AM Philip has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Philip, posted 06-27-2005 3:25 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Philip
Member (Idle past 4744 days)
Posts: 656
From: Albertville, AL, USA
Joined: 03-10-2002


Message 81 of 82 (220107)
06-27-2005 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Adminnemooseus
06-27-2005 12:48 PM


Re: Geological Excellencies?
There certainly are rules against honest "rant", despite my error about Behe.
(Hope I didn't slander Behe, I said "I think" and "seemed" to imply that I may not have known)
Philip

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-27-2005 12:48 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 82 of 82 (501352)
03-05-2009 7:02 PM


Bump - The Omphalos Argument / Last Thursdayism
In the context of the People Don't Know What Creation Science Is topic, Omphaloism has come up, including this rather nice message from Dwise.
So I thought I'd try reactivating this topic.
Moose

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." - H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
"Nixon was a professional politician, and I despised everything he stood for ” but if he were running for president this year against the evil Bush-Cheney gang, I would happily vote for him." - Hunter S. Thompson
"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024