Weather forcasting may serve us well to consider how traditional knowledge is in fact complementary to scientific one. I am engaged in an activity, agriculture, that is strongly dependent on weather, so, weather forecasting is of prime relevance to us. Traditionally, farmers had identified a correlation between certain "signs" and the occurrence of particular metheors. If, for instance, there were clouds, of such and such shapes, on top of a certain mountain in the morning, then most certainly rain would follow in the evening.
Nowadays, every farmer looks the weather forecast on TV, or the Internet. Never the less, weather forecasting not being yet an exact science, some times the old "signs" are very usefull.
I can recall one such very recent experience. In our area we grow alfalfa, and cut it to produce hay. After cutting, it is left on the field to be dryed by sun, but if it rains, the hay is ruined. So, we cut when there is a reasonable expectation for at least three days with no rain. Last summer, I had cut the alfalfa, and it was on the field, then a more expeienced neighbor came to me and said, look this night we have had no damping dew, this is a sign that this afternoon we may have rain. So we proceeded to collect the hay, just in time to avoid the rain, that came.
Also I have to say that climatic change, is destroing much of this traditional knowledge, and the useful "signs" are fewer and fewer. But this is not a good sign for us.