Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   BAD PC problem HELP
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 19 of 34 (483145)
09-20-2008 9:46 AM


Mike, forget everything that everyone just said. I know exactly what your problem is.
On the web, there are plenty of fake registry cleaners that are more of a scam than anything. The problem is it's legal scam. What it is is by pressing yes you allow them to pretty much ruin your computer. In turn, you will have to buy their "products" in order to fix the supposed problems that you never had but now you do.
I first notice these scams when my engineer creationist brother decided to do almost the same thing you did. Long story short, he called me up one day and asked me to come over. After I thoroughly interrogated him, the truth came out that he clicked on these supposed free registry cleaners and then everything went downhill from there.
I ended up backing up all his crap and installed a new OS.
Oh, and the reason sp2 made your computer slow is because it hadn't stopped installing you dumbass. Especially on old machines, it does take forever for it to install quietly in the background. It also requires a lot of memory, so you not having enough memory for it is another problem. By the way, the dumbass thing is a joke. Not everyone is as perfect as I am
I don't know how it is on that godforsaken island that you live on, but over here on the mainland across the pond from you decent computers are cheaper than dirt. You could easily buy a 2ghz 1gig ddr computer for like $120, which I'm sure is like 50 euro or something these days.
But the main thing is do us a favor and don't ever run a program that claims to clean up your registry or whatever other components of your OS again unless you know what the hell is going on. In fact, I wouldn't even turn on your computer without consulting one of us here first. Just drop us a line asking whether it's safe to turn on your computer or not before pressing the power button.

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 22 of 34 (483215)
09-20-2008 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Legend
09-20-2008 5:05 PM


Re: Thanks anyway guys, 'preciate your time
Legend writes:
In other words if you're an 'average Joe' user who uses their computer for web-surfing, letter-writing and basic media management, then you might want to try a Linux distribution. I personally recommend Ubuntu or its lightweight cousin Xubuntu, as their hardware recognition is quite good and the installer also gives you the option to port existing Windows settings (if you install side-by-side with Windows).
Speaking as a linux fan, I highly recommend average joes using any linux distro. Ubuntu is nice, but they really didn't have older machines in mind when they wrote it. Here are some reasons why I recommend against using linux for average joes.
(1) startup is painfully slow, especially on older machines. Compared to xp, ubuntu looks like a snail during startup.
(2) most people don't know how to use linux, so when you want help who are you going to turn to?
(3) online linux "pros" are some of the worst people that have ever existed. When I was a newbie linux user, I went online to ask for help on installing certain programs. I got two 1-liners and a dozen "you're stupid, don't waste our time" answers. The 1-liners absolutely did not help at all and the "you're stupid" answers almost made me stop using linux. I can confidently say that almost everything I know about linux I figured out by myself, and I'm talking about spending thousands and thousands of waking hours trying to make the damn programs to work. So don't expect much help from the online linux community.
(4) It will cost you at least 20 hours trying to figure out how to run basic programs originally written for windows on a linux system. Just don't go there.
In short, it's better if you just stick with xp if you have it already.
Added by edit.
Once upon a time I literally got on my knees and prayed I'd see a desktop after I spent many hours installing a linux OS. My faith went out the window when a black screen turned up. I spent the next eternity trying to figure out the commands to make the damn thing work.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Legend, posted 09-20-2008 5:05 PM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Legend, posted 09-20-2008 7:46 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 25 of 34 (483227)
09-20-2008 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Legend
09-20-2008 7:46 PM


Re: Thanks anyway guys, 'preciate your time
Legend writes:
I strongly disagree with this. I'm dual-booting XP and Ubuntu, with similar set of apps on both and XP is by far the slowest to boot. It makes sense really, if you're using something like Norton IS on your XP you're looking at an extra 20-30 secs added on to boot time to start with.
Well, there's your problem. Norton is a piece of crap... pardon my french. There really isn't a need to have it start up with your OS every single time. What I do with my machine is I have everything disabled and once my machine is up and running I'd start running all the essential programs, like the anti-virus.
Besides, one of the reasons I recommended Ubuntu is that it has one of the largest and friendliest (by Linux standards) online communities that you can turn to if need be.
I agree, to a certain point at least. The problem I see is Mikey Mouse there might be doing other things he's not telling us, like playing games and stuff. I agree that if you only want to use the comp for internet and typing up stuff, then by all means ubuntu is perfect for you. But let's be honest. Do these people actually exist? If you're an average joe, you're gonna need to spend hours and hours trying to figure out stuff, something that Mikey Mouse has mentioned he doesn't have a lot of right now.
You're right up to a point, unfortunately there are a lot of zealots and self-important arseholes in the Linux community and there's also a 'siege mentality' cultivated in certain circles. Having said that, in my experience the Ubuntu community is one of the best ones out there.
I guess I'm an oldie with a grudge from the past. If the ubuntu community is like what you say, I wish Mikey Mouse there the best of luck. I said that with some reservations.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. OpenOffice and Picasa look and feel the same in Linux and Windows. Anyone who's ever used Nero won't have any problems burning CDs with Brasero or K3b. Most Linux file managers adopt Windows convention (i.e. two-pane view, context-menu for actions, drag & drop, etc.
I agree completely... up to a point. What I meant is there will come a time when a linux user will wish he could use a windows based program on a linux machine. Let's face it. Most programs out there aren't written for linux. The way I see it, it's best that linux is left to those who know a little more about comp than the average joe.
Mikey Mouse, here is a message for you if you're reading this. If you have the time, I have no objection to you using ubuntu. It's certainly a user-friendly OS. However, no matter what happens you will be forced to invest time into the project, and it will also take time to getting use to. I'll come back in a few months to say "I told you so".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Legend, posted 09-20-2008 7:46 PM Legend has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024