Legend writes:
I strongly disagree with this. I'm dual-booting XP and Ubuntu, with similar set of apps on both and XP is by far the slowest to boot. It makes sense really, if you're using something like Norton IS on your XP you're looking at an extra 20-30 secs added on to boot time to start with.
Well, there's your problem. Norton is a piece of crap... pardon my french. There really isn't a need to have it start up with your OS every single time. What I do with my machine is I have everything disabled and once my machine is up and running I'd start running all the essential programs, like the anti-virus.
Besides, one of the reasons I recommended Ubuntu is that it has one of the largest and friendliest (by Linux standards) online communities that you can turn to if need be.
I agree, to a certain point at least. The problem I see is Mikey Mouse there might be doing other things he's not telling us, like playing games and stuff. I agree that if you only want to use the comp for internet and typing up stuff, then by all means ubuntu is perfect for you. But let's be honest. Do these people actually exist? If you're an average joe, you're gonna need to spend hours and hours trying to figure out stuff, something that Mikey Mouse has mentioned he doesn't have a lot of right now.
You're right up to a point, unfortunately there are a lot of zealots and self-important arseholes in the Linux community and there's also a 'siege mentality' cultivated in certain circles. Having said that, in my experience the Ubuntu community is one of the best ones out there.
I guess I'm an oldie with a grudge from the past. If the ubuntu community is like what you say, I wish Mikey Mouse there the best of luck. I said that with some reservations.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. OpenOffice and Picasa look and feel the same in Linux and Windows. Anyone who's ever used Nero won't have any problems burning CDs with Brasero or K3b. Most Linux file managers adopt Windows convention (i.e. two-pane view, context-menu for actions, drag & drop, etc.
I agree completely... up to a point. What I meant is there will come a time when a linux user will wish he could use a windows based program on a linux machine. Let's face it. Most programs out there aren't written for linux. The way I see it, it's best that linux is left to those who know a little more about comp than the average joe.
Mikey Mouse, here is a message for you if you're reading this. If you have the time, I have no objection to you using ubuntu. It's certainly a user-friendly OS. However, no matter what happens you will be forced to invest time into the project, and it will also take time to getting use to. I'll come back in a few months to say "I told you so".