ID proponents only want to be allowed to give the evidence against evolution, they have no intention of introducing religion into the science class but it always gets taken as religion when somebody finds Darwinism unsatisfying as an explanation for life.
Since many here feel there is no such evidence perhaps you should open a thread and supply that evidence. We have, here at EvC, have had such attempts made to present the "evidence" and find a mix of ignorance of what evidence is available, obvious nonsense and, rather frequently, (as evidenced in Dover) outright lies.
Perhaps you can do better? You've avoided giving anything but assertions in almost every post you've made. It is about time you did better.
The argument is always made to sound like religion vs science when in actual fact it is two different interpretations of the same scientific evidence.
This is another whine that is made over and over and over. If you think you can offer a different interpretation of scientific evidence that is available then you should start another thread for that too. Note that you have to actually know what the evidence is before you can do this and that you have to consider at least a very large majority of the available evidence.
This has also
never been done when asked for here at EvC. I suggest that you either put up or shut up on this particular tack also.
™ Version 4.2
