Some Brad I quoted
here:
Brad McFall writes:
I feel a little stupid because I learnt something- just joking!!
The Wittgentsein folklore did not work on me however because I got a great sense of Copernicus from Gingerich and Poland from an native.
Thanks for the video. It is going to help me with a conversation that my two brothers always have about possible spin experiments.
I DO struggle with making sure I am not making the reverse error Coleman is talking about. It is possible I have made it but I am not sure whether Sidney might consider rejecting Von Neumann as I do over (for me) how he wrote up Cantor’s ordertypes and ALSO told Feynmann to not care about what the government was doing.
The thesis I wrote but what was rejected by Provine wailed against the history of biology for not explaining how vitalism was written out. It just disappeared from the literature tout court. That however is nothing to do with Telsa on electrons etc. I do not see that I need to refer back when vitalism was and J. Loeb had not written. I am struggling rather with Dyson’s claim that we do not have Einstein’s view anymore. This video helps me as I am trying to read comprehensibly Penrose's "Road to reality" while listening to the Feynamnn lectures from the 60s.
I suppose space like seperation could be considered if life off Earth is admitted. Perhaps that causes some issue for me as well. Tesla’s work would all be on Earth however much one wishes (or not) to accept Wolf and Leibniz rather than Kant or some other viewpoint in a chain with Bertrand Russell.
As run through the Yoda translater:
Yoda's version writes:
I feel a little stupid because I learnt something- just joking!!
The wittgentsein folklore did work on me however not because I got a great sense of copernicus from gingerich and poland from an native.
For the video thanks. Going to help me with a conversation that my two brothers always have about possible spin experiments, is it.
Making the reverse error coleman is talking about I do struggle with making sure I am not. Sure whether sidney might consider rejecting von neumann as I do over (for me) how he wrote up cantor's ordertypes and also told feynmann to not care about what the government was doing it is possible I have made it but I am not.
Explaining how vitalism was written out the thesis I wrote but what was rejected by provine wailed against the history of biology for not. It just disappeared from the literature tout court. Nothing to do with telsa on electrons etc, that however is. I see not that I need to refer back when vitalism was and j. Loeb had written not. I am struggling rather with dyson's claim that we have not einstein's view anymore. This video helps me as, trying to read comprehensibly penrose's, am I "To reality road" To the feynamnn lectures from the 60s while listening.
Considered if life off earth is admitted, I suppose space like seperation could be. Me as well perhaps that causes some issue for. All be on earth however much one wishes (or not) to accept wolf and leibniz rather than kant or some other viewpoint in a chain with bertrand russell, tesla's work would. Yes, hmmm.
Now the question is, does that clarify things?
Moose
Edited by Minnemooseus, : No reason given.