On the Threshold of Bigotry

That would explain why you continuously miss the meat and potatoes of an argument and go right for the cordial.

---

KindlyEveryone deserves a neatly dug grave. It is the timing that's in dispute.‘—

I would have to know your motives to judge whether it was or was not bigoted. I do not, however, need to know your motives to know it is rude, stupid and, if I were, insulting. You need a time out, dude. BTW: Where I come from, calling someone a dude can get you shot, dude. The implication of this is that you have been insulted ” possibly in return. Suck it up, dude.

---

KindlyEveryone deserves a neatly dug grave. It is the timing that's in dispute.‘—

If this is your perception of an apology the wonder in your getting to divorce court three times lies in how you got to the altar three times. I have made no such suggestions. Your propensity to read what you want into what is said by others has been a continuing struggle for us all. I thank you for your kind administrations toward my civil liberties. In concession I will agree with you that one is not a bigot if one thinks dictionaries are carved in stone. That only makes one an idiot. However, you'll have to excuse me if I don't trust you slavish insistence upon the meaning of words as your reason for rejecting the idea of gay marriage when you so freely misuse the word "threats".It seems my perception of concession needs as much work as your perception of apology.Where I admire ad hominim as much as anyone I know, this had gotten past useful some time back. See you in another thread.Edited by lyx2no, : Grammar

---

KindlyEveryone deserves a neatly dug grave. It is the timing that's in dispute.One hot lesbian.

It is not a prerequisite for a Gay rights advocate to be a Gay male. Some are straight males. Some are wives. Some are hot lesbians. Some are idiots. So there's room for you.

---

KindlyWere Christians ever to speak in non-ambiguous terms and listen with critical ears there would soon be no Christians for lack of agreement as to God plan.

Because they don't have to answer to you, that's why. Leave them alone and let them live their lives as they please. They are not making any request of you but to get out of the way. You don't have to like it. You don't have to approve. You don't have to do anything. Nothing, nothing at all. Just don't get in the way.How are you unable to distinguish your interference with their freedom of action and their interference with your interfering with their freedom of action?If they were demanding that you pay for their weddings you'd have a point. But they ask nothing of you except to be left alone.And for Pete's sake, would you please answer Rrhain's questions already.

---

KindlyWere Christians ever to speak in non-ambiguous terms and listen with critical ears there would soon be no Christians for lack of agreement as to God plan.