I read the passage perfectly well enough and pretty well as fast as I read anything else, quickly. After reading a few words without difficulty, I sort of read on, under the presumption that I would not encounter any difficult concept and since there was not one in there, that made getting it read for certain probably easier than some "random" paragraph posted onto EvC.
I think, thinking especially in science, HAS altered 'position' relative to language in general and it's grammar as a rule, precisely as Poincare said below:
quote:
Science and Method, Henri Poincare, Barnes and Noble Books, 2004(1908)
The difference between the ~pre-1900 science and grammar and the thought that changes this position(due in part to Russell) as it is logically written is readable between the blue and yellow highlights below.
quote:
Introduction to Logic, Immanual Kant, Philosophical Library 1963 (1800)
and yet it is only the position of the Poincare chapters above that enabled me read Poincare here from within Kant's extirpated words BUT NOT THOUGHTS.
Spelling is less important than grammar. But with spelling errors, the same mistakes in quickly righting writing logically, results in grammatical errors under the same rule. Thus, letters are often off a bit in this horizon where a letters really a fake symbols or something Derrida would have liked to work more with were he still with us.