Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,331 Year: 3,588/9,624 Month: 459/974 Week: 72/276 Day: 0/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religion v Spirituality
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 138 of 161 (457563)
02-24-2008 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by pelican
01-17-2008 5:48 AM


Re: Knowable spirituality
I don't believe I have a physical organ called hate!
Way to miss the point.
If you believe psychological is physical, there's no point, is there?
No point in what? Debating?
{ABE: I will read the rest of the thread and offer my commentary afterwards. I don't want to drag the thread back to a place where my comments don't evolve the discussion further.}
Edited by Jaderis, : No reason given.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by pelican, posted 01-17-2008 5:48 AM pelican has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 142 of 161 (457570)
02-24-2008 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by pelican
01-17-2008 7:32 PM


Re: Emotional energy v physical reaction
am referring to the emotions, not the physical reactions to them.
How are they differentiated?
The only reason I know that I feel hate towards someone is because of the physical reaction I get.
The only reason I know that I feel love towards someone is because of the physical reaction i get.
My "mind" might rationalize both of these emotions (as well as all of the others) and allow me to express them in words, but my body actually has a reaction (and cannot often be expressed in words).

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by pelican, posted 01-17-2008 7:32 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 7:54 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 145 of 161 (457578)
02-24-2008 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Granny Magda
01-20-2008 10:15 PM


Re: Knowable spirituality
Granny writes:
GM's dictionary writes:
3. Inspiring awe and reverence; spiritual.
It's that last one that is the closest fit for what I am trying to describe. There is a problem for atheists in trying to communicate this feeling, because our culture surrounds it in religious or supernatural imagery and language. If it were just a question of trying to avoid religious words and phrases, I would not care. What makes me interested in this is the argument put forward by many theists, to the effect that atheism must be a barren and depressing world-view, lacking in wonder. I reject this idea. I think that atheists can and do experience a sense of the transcendent, a feeling of inspiration, awe and reverence. Unfortunately, i think that many words have picked up too much baggage for use in this context. "Spiritual" is a the prime example. It has become so associated with religion and especially the new age movement, that its use by an atheist has become confusing.
Exactly. I have tried to translate this wonder to theists many times, but have lacked the vocabulary to do so without letting their minds latch onto one loaded word.
I find it numinous that I am made of stars. I find it numinous that every one of my ancestors has "made it." I find it numinous that I am here with my consciousness typing my words to you. But, why would I give the credit to some being for which there is no evidence for?
It is numinous and awe inspiring, but it, also, just is. As the etching on the transformers of my childhood say "Pepper wuz here." What I do beyond that is up to me. And that is numinous.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Granny Magda, posted 01-20-2008 10:15 PM Granny Magda has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 147 of 161 (457583)
02-24-2008 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by pelican
01-22-2008 7:33 AM


Re: Knowable spirituality
I am not talking about improving oneself, but truly knowing self and being true to oneself. This is the spirituality to which I refer. Not the supernatural but the natural which is super.
Um..the what? How is that different from the "supernatural?"
Can you quantify the "natural" part of a person and then say that they have gone "super?"
Mandella said, "The problem isn't that we think too highly of ourselves but that we don't think highly enough."
I agree with Mandela, but possibly in a different way than he did (I don't know I haven't been able to ask him).
People have a problem with attributing their intelligence or their talent or their sense to themselves or sometimes even to their family or community. They instead attribute it to some invisible deity. They do not think highly of themselves (or those who have helped them). Or not "highly enough."
They think that they would not have been able to achieve what they did without divine interference. I like to chalk it up to human ingenuity. We can always do better. And we will.
We must think "highly" of ourselves.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by pelican, posted 01-22-2008 7:33 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 10:15 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 148 of 161 (457584)
02-24-2008 8:54 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by pelican
02-24-2008 7:54 AM


Re: Emotional energy v physical reaction
It is exactly this reaction that cannot be described in words that I am referring to. When I have this physical reaction I can name it anything I want but in truth, it is a sensation.
But you tried to separate the emotional from the physical.
Just because you cannot describe the "sensation" in words does not mean that it is not a physical reaction.
We can name it anything we want to. We can even pretend it (our rational reaction to it) is not there, but the physical reaction is there. That is how we know what we are feeling "emotionally."
Otherwise, we are sociopaths, just going through the motions because we understand the actions and reasons behind the "emotion" but not actually feeling (physically) all of the reactions associated with the emotion.
There is a physical response to every emotion. They can be explained by science but they cannot be separated.
The problem with describing the emotion in words is not a problem of science, but of linguistics and individual talent.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 7:54 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 10:22 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 149 of 161 (457585)
02-24-2008 9:00 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by pelican
01-21-2008 12:19 AM


Re: Knowable spirituality
I do believe there is a fundamental truth that we all can know and it will only concern the human race
Why will it only concern the human race?
What is so special about us?
When will we all know it?

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by pelican, posted 01-21-2008 12:19 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 9:38 AM Jaderis has replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 151 of 161 (457590)
02-24-2008 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by pelican
02-24-2008 9:38 AM


Re: Knowable spirituality
who knows writes:
Jaderis writes:
Why will it only concern the human race?
What is so special about us?
When will we all know it?
Because we have a consciousness.
Because we have a consciousness.
Different from other beings' consciousness? How? How do you know?
Not a clue because it depends on the individual. I believe some already know it and it has a ripple effect on the mass consciousness.
Mass consciousness? What does that mean?
We are far more connected than just physically
Like culturally, maybe? Migration of ideas, maybe?
and I am not speaking of anything supernatural, just natural that is super.
I'm sorry, but what does that mean? It looks like nonsense to me.
Take our imaginations as one example.
As an example of what? Natural human imagination that is "super?"
Look at the creations from the collective imaginations.
You mean, "look what we can can accomplish by traveling and exchanging ideas?" Are you saying that if we all put our minds together all at once we can create some kind of super-duper creative machine? Awesome.
Is it possible that we can create from more than just the mind? Is our consciousness contained in only the mind?
What, exactly, is "more than just the mind?" Why qualify "the mind" with "just?" Is your mind somehow not enough? I actually like my mind. What about you?
Are you stuck on the whole "we only use 10% of our brains" thing?
How do you propose that we use more? And what do we use it for? To feel more "spiritual" or to resolve unanswered scientific questions? Or to control our internal organs better? Or maybe to live longer?
Is it possible that we create from pain, desire, hate, love, empathy, rejection, unworthiness etc.?
Um...yeah. But where do these things come from except from within ourselves? Are these things that you list objects that exist outside ourselves that we have to find?
I know I have for sure.
Congratulations. You are human.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 9:38 AM pelican has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 155 of 161 (457597)
02-24-2008 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by pelican
02-24-2008 10:15 AM


Re: Knowable spirituality
Supernatural implies aliens and ghosts and telepathy and speaking with the dead. Things of that nature which take us away from the reality of humanity.
Sure it does, but it also implies invisible deities and anything that cannot be observed in the natural world.
The only example at this point I can think of that is a super natural normal visible aspect of humanity is genius.
But, "genius" can be observed as a natural phenomenon and can be applied across many fields and have many definitions.
How does "genius" apply to your definition of spirituality?
I absolutely agree with every word but it must be based in reality. Have you seen the number of contestants on American idol who truly believe they have talent? It is of no use to believe you are what you are not.
No use? According to who? Can one believe themselves to be something they are not and then discover through the "failure" process who they are? (p.s. i have only watched the "audition" episodes of the second season of American Idol)
Belief in self of who you truly are, instead of who you want to be is where the change occurs to reach one's own ptotential.
Cannot confidence in one's abilities come along with recognizing one's weaknesses? Wanting to be "something" will likely carry you through a long process of finding out what that "something" is not.
Thanks for your interesting questions.
You're welcome.
I'm not really trying to prove my concept that I do believe is true for me, but rather discuss the possibilities in the aspects of self we have not investigated with any serious commitment because we take them for granted.
It's "true" for you, so what's with the "we?"
Although the concept seems quite simple it is not, because we are complex beings. We all have different belief systems, different life experiences, different identities but in this we are the same. We have thoughts, beliefs, emotions, imaginations, faith etc. which I believe are contained in the whole consciousness that we are only partly aware of.
Right. We all have complex emotional lives. We know that.
What is the "whole consciousness?"
How do you know that we are only "partly aware" of it?

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 10:15 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 5:43 PM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 156 of 161 (457600)
02-24-2008 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by pelican
02-24-2008 10:22 AM


Re: Emotional energy v physical reaction
Jadaris
Jaderis
are you looking at the emotional reaction caused by a physical action?
Like what? Someone hitting my mother? That causes both an emotional reaction and a physical one that are inseparable. I feel "anger." I know that I feel "angry" because my temperature rises and adrenaline is pumped into my system (to put it crudely). That is how I "know" that I am "angry." If I didn't have this physical reaction I would not be "angry."
If so, is it possible that an emotional action can cause a physical reaction?
What is an "emotional action?"
How do you separate your emotions from your physical, bodily reactions, including the involuntary ones?
I know I don't. I can control impulses that come about from strong emotions, but my body feels it just the same.
What is an "emotion" but your body telling you that you feel it?
It doesn't make any sense to have an "emotion" without being able to feel it.

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 10:22 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 6:19 PM Jaderis has not replied

  
Jaderis
Member (Idle past 3443 days)
Posts: 622
From: NY,NY
Joined: 06-16-2006


Message 157 of 161 (457602)
02-24-2008 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by pelican
02-24-2008 10:22 AM


Re: Emotional energy v physical reaction
PS. Could you please answer the questions I asked of you?

"You are metaphysicians. You can prove anything by metaphysics; and having done so, every metaphysician can prove every other metaphysician wrong--to his own satisfaction. You are anarchists in the realm of thought. And you are mad cosmos-makers. Each of you dwells in a cosmos of his own making, created out of his own fancies and desires. You do not know the real world in which you live, and your thinking has no place in the real world except in so far as it is phenomena of mental aberration." -The Iron Heel by Jack London
"Hazards exist that are not marked" - some bar in Chelsea

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by pelican, posted 02-24-2008 10:22 AM pelican has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024