Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   National Budgets and Budget Deficits
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 2 of 19 (455185)
02-11-2008 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
02-10-2008 10:21 PM


GDR writes:
There is the usual talk about cutting spending but nobody is suggesting that they will bring in a balanced budget, unless I'm missing something which is always possible.
Well, considering the fact that most christians seem to think Bush is Jesus Christ II, it's political suicide to question the way he handled our budget. At the same time, he's run this country so much into deficit that I don't think the current candidates know what to do to rebalance the budget.
This I have to question. Republicans pride themselves in the ideals that the best gov is the small gov that's least interfering with our lives as well as least expensive. Bush has done just the opposite and somehow he's still considered the 2nd son of god. Makes no sense to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GDR, posted 02-10-2008 10:21 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by GDR, posted 02-11-2008 11:03 AM Taz has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 14 of 19 (455578)
02-12-2008 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by GDR
02-12-2008 7:45 PM


GDR writes:
It seems to me that my approach is about as simplistic as it gets. Deficits just mean accumulating and accelerating debt. High levels of debt that you don't have the income or the reserves to cover just ain't good.
GDR, you didn't actually answer him at all.
It helps to view deficits as borrowing money from the future by spending more money than what you actually have. Ordinary people do this by using their credit cards. The difference between the government doing this and ordinary people doing this is ordinary people have to pay back their debt while the government could continue to do this without anyone actually calling in the debts. After all, your grandson can't just pick up the phone and call 70 years into the past and say "gee, grandpa, could you please start paying back the money you borrowed?"
Yes, everyone seems to agree that deficits are bad, but noone actually knows why it is bad.
In the past, other governments have tried to spend more money than they had by printing out more money. This created inflation and eventually ran their economies down the drain. However, so far there hasn't really been any disasterous side affect that anyone could see from borrowing money from the future. I guess as long as the debt collectors from the future don't show up at our doorsteps, we'll continue to spend money that we don't actually have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by GDR, posted 02-12-2008 7:45 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by GDR, posted 02-13-2008 1:32 AM Taz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024