ok. i understand now i think. you don't believe in God.
time doesn't prove God is not, yet you want to tell people who do believe in God that their belief in his abilities is silly because time exists, which means that your trying to say because of time, there is no God?
ok..i confused myself.
I'm not sure your motive, but as already pointed out, God is defined by most as being everywhere.
i think this might help you understand the view, i call it, the publican and the scientist:
the publican and the scientist:
setting: a small hill outside a bustling city. two men are seated near a small tree, one is a publican, the other is a scientist.
publican: i wish it were possible to see God.
scientist: i see God all the time.
publican: what!? how can you say such a thing?
scientist: energy cannot be created or destroyed. that means all that i see has come from the very body of God.
publican: with all the filth, and sin and evils in the world, do you really think that God would want that as a part of his body?
scientist: i do not claim to know why God does what he does, i am simply making an observation.
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides