Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Faith and Belief ⇒

Would Evolutionists accept evidence for Creation?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Would Evolutionists accept evidence for Creation?
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 8 of 85 (446062)
01-04-2008 8:19 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Rahvin
01-03-2008 8:42 PM

is evidence admisable?
I'm willing to listen to real evidence
​
does this mean it would not be off topic for me to present my evidence?
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rahvin, posted 01-03-2008 8:42 PM Rahvin has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Adminnemooseus, posted 01-04-2008 8:39 PM tesla has replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 10 of 85 (446067)
01-04-2008 8:42 PM 		Reply to: Message 9 by Adminnemooseus
01-04-2008 8:39 PM

Re: Adminnemooseus opinion is that this topic would best be "evolutionists only"
See, I don't care about any sort of "presupposition" or "agenda." My only agenda is the desire for accuracy. I want to know and understand the truth, as closely as we are able to verifiably determine.
​
As per the subtitle, I think that this topic would function best if only "evolutionists" participated.
​
and how many evolutionists are really searching for evidence of creation?
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Adminnemooseus, posted 01-04-2008 8:39 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by bluescat48, posted 01-04-2008 8:52 PM tesla has not replied
 Message 18 by Rahvin, posted 01-04-2008 9:03 PM tesla has replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 85 (446070)
01-04-2008 8:51 PM 		Reply to: Message 11 by Percy
01-04-2008 8:46 PM

even if a global flood was proven, what evidence is that of a creator?
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Percy, posted 01-04-2008 8:46 PM Percy has not replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 16 of 85 (446075)
01-04-2008 8:57 PM 		Reply to: Message 15 by jar
01-04-2008 8:53 PM

Re: Many Evolutionists are Creationists.
If the new model really did explain what is seen better than the current model, I would of course accept it.
​
then is it off topic for me to propose a new model with evidence?
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by jar, posted 01-04-2008 8:53 PM jar has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Rahvin, posted 01-04-2008 9:05 PM tesla has replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 20 of 85 (446084)
01-04-2008 9:08 PM 		Reply to: Message 18 by Rahvin
01-04-2008 9:03 PM

Re: Adminnemooseus opinion is that this topic would best be "evolutionists only"
Scientists in general have been searching for evidence of the Biblical myths since serious scientific inquiry began. Unfortunately for literalists, the evidence uncovered thus far has soundly contradicted several Biblical claims, like that of the Flood, and of a young Earth.
​
i have evidence that is a biblical claim. would it be admissible for me to discuss it ?
​
Edited by tesla, : No reason given.
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Rahvin, posted 01-04-2008 9:03 PM Rahvin has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 01-04-2008 9:16 PM tesla has replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 21 of 85 (446085)
01-04-2008 9:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 19 by Rahvin
01-04-2008 9:05 PM

Re: Many Evolutionists are Creationists.
I would absolutely love to hear it. But I would bet that would be best placed in a new thread, lest it completely derail this one.
​
ok, would you start the thread ?
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Rahvin, posted 01-04-2008 9:05 PM Rahvin has not replied
  
tesla
Member (Idle past 1624 days)
Posts: 1199
Joined: 12-22-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 23 of 85 (446094)
01-04-2008 9:20 PM 		Reply to: Message 22 by jar
01-04-2008 9:16 PM

Re: Adminnemooseus opinion is that this topic would best be "evolutionists only"
the evidence being a biblical claim doesn't mean it originated from the bible. it just means it "happens" to also be in the bible.
​
keep your mind from this way of enquiry, for never will you show that not-being is
~parmenides
This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 01-04-2008 9:16 PM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 01-04-2008 9:24 PM tesla has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024