Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,813 Year: 3,070/9,624 Month: 915/1,588 Week: 98/223 Day: 9/17 Hour: 5/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 143 of 312 (429351)
10-19-2007 12:29 PM


You can take your silly little debate rules and cram them up your ass, cop.
Message 40
Would an admin please step in and have a word with CatholicScientist?

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 170 of 312 (434770)
11-17-2007 8:20 AM
Reply to: Message 169 by nator
11-17-2007 7:01 AM


Re: AdminPD
Nator, I had that exact same thought last night when I read AdminPD's comment.
It's so blatant!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by nator, posted 11-17-2007 7:01 AM nator has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 177 of 312 (435188)
11-19-2007 6:05 PM


Simple aka reversespin
Admins.
Is it true, as RAZD suggests, that "simple" is one and the same with "reversespin"?
If so, "reversespin" needs to be banned indefinitely as well.

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by RAZD, posted 11-19-2007 6:10 PM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 180 by jar, posted 11-19-2007 6:54 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 197 of 312 (437407)
11-29-2007 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by CK
11-27-2007 11:33 AM


Re: some action needed in the Logic thread
I'm afraid we need action in the Logic thread again.
Please.
Someone step in and do something with M. Dawn Bertot.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by CK, posted 11-27-2007 11:33 AM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by AdminPD, posted 11-30-2007 6:46 AM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 200 of 312 (437531)
11-30-2007 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by AdminPD
11-30-2007 6:46 AM


Re: some action needed in the Logic thread
AdminPD,
I'm afraid your warning has had no effect whatsoever.
Dawn continues to post ...
"An axiom is a self evident truth."
... to any and all responses.
This is unproductive and tiresome.
Perhaps a short suspension will change his tune.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by AdminPD, posted 11-30-2007 6:46 AM AdminPD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by ringo, posted 11-30-2007 12:34 PM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 202 by AdminWounded, posted 11-30-2007 12:48 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 204 of 312 (437679)
12-01-2007 12:27 AM


Will someone keep an eye on Beretta over at Why Should ID be Taught in Science Class?
He's trying to derail the thread. Again.

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 206 of 312 (437702)
12-01-2007 2:03 AM
Reply to: Message 205 by Hyroglyphx
12-01-2007 1:01 AM


Re: some action needed in the Logic thread
... it is not any way a breach of forum rules to have bad arguments.
It's clearly a violation of Rule 4.
And while MartinV could be said to have "bad arguments", this Dawn character has no arguments.
He simply repeats, ad nauseum, "It's an axiomatic truth."
This dude is in serious need of admin action.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-01-2007 1:01 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by AdminWounded, posted 12-01-2007 5:09 AM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 208 of 312 (437736)
12-01-2007 5:28 AM
Reply to: Message 207 by AdminWounded
12-01-2007 5:09 AM


Re: some action needed in the Logic thread
Naw. Don't close it.
But don't youall have a cage for his sort? ... Some kind of "this-is-the-only-thread-this-wingnut-can-post-in" place that I remember somebody mentioning once not too long ago ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by AdminWounded, posted 12-01-2007 5:09 AM AdminWounded has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by AdminWounded, posted 12-01-2007 5:34 AM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 210 by Admin, posted 12-01-2007 8:40 AM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 214 of 312 (437833)
12-01-2007 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by RAZD
12-01-2007 10:36 AM


Re: some action needed in the Logic thread
This would be an argument for re-opening Beretta's thread and directing his misinformation on evolution to that thread and Beretta can use up his own threads with nonsense instead of being off topic on other threads.
Is there any hope of this happening?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by RAZD, posted 12-01-2007 10:36 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 224 by RAZD, posted 12-02-2007 9:41 AM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 275 of 312 (442311)
12-20-2007 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 273 by anglagard
12-20-2007 5:42 PM


Re: Catholic Scientist needs some consequences
An apology at the very least.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by anglagard, posted 12-20-2007 5:42 PM anglagard has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 286 of 312 (444101)
12-28-2007 10:44 AM


AdminPD.
From your recent post:
And you are not a moderator molbiogirl, which means you don't have the luxury to post correcting someone else without also moving the discussion forward.
His cut and paste wasn't that lengthy and he doesn't make a habit of it as some do.
Please refrain from conversational posts this close to the end of the thread.
1. I did not say that Buz used a lengthy cut and paste. Rule 6 states: "... in your own words". Buz added nothing.
2. The post was not conversational. I admonished Buz for his unceremonious dump of nothing but a cut and paste. And I moved the discussion forward (I pointed to the error of his assumption that a modern cell is equivalent to a proto-cell).
In my opinion, you have yet again taken the opportunity to advance a personal agenda as a moderator (and it's not just with me -- you've done this with other participants as well).

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 7:04 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 307 by AdminNWR, posted 12-29-2007 1:50 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 288 of 312 (444248)
12-28-2007 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 287 by AdminPD
12-28-2007 7:04 PM


Re: AdminPD.
I disagree, so please refrain from similar style of posting in that thread.
As I assumed you would. However, Percy said that Buz didn't add anything to the CnP either, so I am not alone in my assessment of the situation.
What personal agenda? If you're going to make accusations, please substantiate them.
I (and others) have done so in the past, to no avail.
Since you won't cop to your bias, I see no reason to repeat the exercise.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 287 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 7:04 PM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 7:46 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 290 of 312 (444277)
12-28-2007 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by AdminPD
12-28-2007 7:46 PM


Re: AdminPD.
As you wish.
...and he doesn't make a habit of it as some do.
What does this mean?
Nator Message 169 writes:
Might you be inappropriately using your Admin status to lean on me, perhaps because you are resentful of what happened to you in the Misunderstanding Empiricism thread?
Rrhain Message 121 writes:
She asked a question as to what I think she should have done ...
Question: Is it possible for an administrator to overreach?
Yes or no.
If so, then yes, there will be times when an administrator should keep his or her nose out of it.
Were I to continue the search in previous versions of the Moderation thread, I have no doubt I would find more.
That you have never copped to bias is no surprise.
That you are accused of it repeatedly is telling.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 7:46 PM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by AdminNem, posted 12-28-2007 8:32 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 292 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 8:38 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 293 of 312 (444299)
12-28-2007 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 292 by AdminPD
12-28-2007 8:38 PM


Re: AdminPD.
If you read the discussions completely, I think you find that nator did not continue to push the idea that I was retaliating and Rrhain didn't insinuate that I was pushing a personal agenda.
The fact that Nator and Rrhain chose to stop beating a dead horse is no surprise.
You won't cop to it. Period. As I said before, it is a pointless exercise.
You are in denial.
So if you feel I am pushing a personal agenda, please explain what personal agenda I'm pushing.
You seem to moderate piddly non issues with people you have strong disagreements with.
Your examples did not show anything except people displeased with an admin action. All admins who actively moderate have them.
Yet, some moderators have the grace and humility to admit it when they are wrong. Moose, for example.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 8:38 PM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by jar, posted 12-28-2007 8:51 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 299 by AdminPD, posted 12-28-2007 9:25 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2641 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 295 of 312 (444304)
12-28-2007 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 291 by AdminNem
12-28-2007 8:32 PM


Re: AdminPD.
You've been answered. Whether or not the verdict was to your liking is now immaterial at this point.
PD specifically asked me to support my contention that she is biased. I did so.
While I'm sure you'll just throw out the "bias" card, it would be well with you to know that you are in no position to talk about personal bias...
I am not a moderator. I can exhibit whatever bias I wish.
... or critique others on lengthy copy and pastes.
Unlike some, I provide support for my assertions.
And I have been specifically asked by other participants to provide LENGTHIER cites (Jaderis, for example).
When you (or Buz), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "lengthy CnPs", I showed you in no uncertain terms that my cites were no more than 3 sentences long in that thread.
When you (or Buz), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "not using my own words" to support my position, I pointed out that I had used an average of 128 words per post to buttress my assertions in that thread.
When you (or Buz ... it's so hard to keep differentiate between the 2 of you), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "posting bare links", I pointed out that I have not posted nothing but an URL. Ever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by AdminNem, posted 12-28-2007 8:32 PM AdminNem has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 309 by AdminNem, posted 12-29-2007 4:14 PM molbiogirl has not replied
 Message 310 by Buzsaw, posted 12-29-2007 4:28 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024