Since we are carrying out the same argument over two different threads, I am going to stick to the other one. That way we don't have to repeat anything.
That said, I want to address something here.
gene90 writes:
quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have once again proven your lack of knowledge on what you speak.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? I'm sorry Holmes, but hearing that from you just doesn't carry any bite.
While I might have been sarcastic your rebuttal is a little strange. You have not actually refuted facts I have mentioned, nor discredited criticisms of your logic.
I normally do not give references for facts which are easily looked up, especially online. I have been called on this before and proven myself each time. If you doubt any of the facts I present just ask me for references on the ones you can't find.
Please don't brush off facts with comments like "secret moon base huh?'" or logical problems with "paranoia."
Also it seems odd that this exchange was in reference to comments you made about me, which were not true. I can clearly rebut comments you make about me and they should have bite.
You have characterized my actions and put words in my mouth, with just about every response you've made and none of them have been close to accurate. You clearly do not know who I am or what I am about, so I'd appreciate it if you dealt with actually criticizing my points and stop blasting into this liberal strawman you keep portraying as me.
I did not accuse you of ranting, you said your posts are simply rants at an opposition which never listens and never changes their mind. I know my posts are long, but they are hardly rants, and I hope any extreme comments are supported. If not they should be easy enough to refute with facts or logic.
I will refrain from from ad hominem.
------------------
holmes