6days responds to me:
quote:
They seem to be comprehensive on the surface. However, can you please give us some references that prove that life began in a primordial sea? a petrie dish?
You're going to have to give me a definition of "life," first.
We have been able to create self-replicating, auto-catalysing, homochiral molecules in the lab. If that isn't life, it's pretty damned close.
But if you mean something like what we would see as a modern cell, then no, I can't because we don't have any experiments that have managed to get that far.
But here's the thing: It doesn't matter. You're confusing evolution with abiogenesis. Evolution doesn't care how life started. It is compatible with every form of genesis out there. Life could have started chemically through abiogenesis, supernaturally through god zap-poofing it into existence, extraterrestrially through panspermia or alien seeding, interdimensionally through a rift in space-time, or any other method I haven't mentioned. So long as that life did not reproduce itself perfectly from generation to generation, then evolution is satisfied.
quote:
When evolutionists produce anima from inanima then perhaps I'll take your evolutionary hypothesis more serious.
Why? Are you saying god can't use evolution?
Who are you to tell god what can and cannot be done by god?
Again, evolution is not the same as abiogenesis. The Catholic Church seems to think that god got life started but it evolved after that. Surely you're not saying that the Pope is an atheist, are you?
quote:
Even Hawking said that it was impossible for life to begin from the inanimate and he seems to be your current guru.
Stephen Hawking is a cosmologist. Why would anybody look to him for an opinion regarding biology? You don't go to a tax attorney for advice on lowering your cholesterol, even though your tax attorney is a very smart person.
------------------
Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!