Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How to debate the "Evolution Should NOT be taught in public schools" perspective?
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 47 of 68 (440602)
12-13-2007 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Dani2008
12-13-2007 7:39 PM


Re: excuse me
If you look more closely, you will see that he was replying to an earlier post that he himself had written. And I believe that he also quoted from his own earlier post. A definite stab at humor.
FWIW, I have been known to review older code from our software project (over a hundred files and, I'm sure, several thousands of lines of code) and shake my head wondering what that idiot was thinking. Then I realize it was something that I had written a few years prior.
Notice the punch line of Silent H's joke. As he suddenly realized that he had written the post that he was now criticizing.

{When you search for God, y}ou can't go to the people who believe already. They've made up their minds and want to convince you of their own personal heresy.
("The Jehovah Contract", AKA "Der Jehova-Vertrag", by Viktor Koman, 1984)
Humans wrote the Bible; God wrote the world.
(from filk song "Word of God" by Dr. Catherine Faber, No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.echoschildren.org/CDlyrics/WORDGOD.HTML)
Of course, if Dr. Mortimer's surmise should be correct and we are dealing with forces outside the ordinary laws of Nature, there is an end of our investigation. But we are bound to exhaust all other hypotheses before falling back upon this one.
(Sherlock Holmes in The Hound of the Baskervilles)
Gentry's case depends upon his halos remaining a mystery. Once a naturalistic explanation is discovered, his claim of a supernatural origin is washed up. So he will not give aid or support to suggestions that might resolve the mystery. Science works toward an increase in knowledge; creationism depends upon a lack of it. Science promotes the open-ended search; creationism supports giving up and looking no further. It is clear which method Gentry advocates.
("Gentry's Tiny Mystery -- Unsupported by Geology" by J. Richard Wakefield, Creation/Evolution Issue XXII, Winter 1987-1988, pp 31-32)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Dani2008, posted 12-13-2007 7:39 PM Dani2008 has not replied

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 49 of 68 (440664)
12-14-2007 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Silent H
12-13-2007 10:34 PM


Re: excuse me
"So I said to myself, 'Self, ... '"
(Arlo Gutherie)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Silent H, posted 12-13-2007 10:34 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024